MOTO vs. ASMH

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

MOTO (SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF) and ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. MOTO is actively managed, while ASMH is passively managed. Over the past year, MOTO returned 34.06% vs 143.15% for ASMH. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MOTO charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ASMH.

Performance

MOTO vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOTO achieves a 17.24% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 58.30% return.

MOTO

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: -0.75%
• 6M: 9.06%
• YTD: 17.24%
• 1Y: 34.06%
• 3Y*: 14.56%
• 5Y*: 7.58%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.32%

ASMH

• 1D: 1.21%
• 1M: -7.04%
• 6M: 18.29%
• YTD: 58.30%
• 1Y: 143.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 106.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	$122.06K	$253.89K	$304.89K
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF	$14.22K	$15.41K	$15.45K

MOTO vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF	17.24%	44.04%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	58.30%	59.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MOTO and ASMH is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025	0.70

The correlation between MOTO and ASMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MOTO vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MOTO

MOTO Risk / Return Rank: 54
MOTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
MOTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
MOTO Omega Ratio Rank: 53
MOTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
MOTO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

ASMH

ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 95
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 91
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MOTO vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MOTO	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	3.31	-1.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	3.65	-1.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.45	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	6.69	-4.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.46	24.13	-17.67

MOTO vs. ASMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOTO Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the ASMH Sharpe Ratio of 3.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOTO and ASMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MOTO vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTO drawdown since its inception was -38.24%, which is greater than ASMH's maximum drawdown of -21.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTO and ASMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOTO	ASMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.24%	-21.52%	-16.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.07%	-21.52%	+5.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.43%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.85%	-17.37%	+6.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.94%	-4.78%	-5.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.29%	5.96%	-0.67%

Volatility

MOTO vs. ASMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) is 8.50%, while ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) has a volatility of 13.26%. This indicates that MOTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MOTO	ASMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.50%	13.26%	-4.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.79%	34.86%	-14.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.52%	43.58%	-19.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.25%	41.60%	-17.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.51%	41.60%	-15.09%

MOTO vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTO has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOTO vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

MOTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than ASMH's 1.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	1.94%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF	0.90%	1.06%	1.07%	2.73%	2.33%	0.55%	2.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MOTO and ASMH in my portfolio?

MOTO and ASMH have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MOTO or ASMH?

ASMH has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to MOTO (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTO dropped -38.24% vs ASMH's -21.52%.

Which ETF is better, MOTO or ASMH?

On 1-year performance, ASMH leads with 143.15% vs 34.06% for MOTO. On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, MOTO has been the lower-risk option at 8.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MOTO or ASMH?

Over the 1-year period, ASMH has performed better with a 143.15% return vs 34.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MOTO or ASMH?

ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MOTO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MOTO or ASMH?

ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.90% for MOTO.

What is the main difference between MOTO and ASMH?

They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MOTO and 0.19% for ASMH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.