PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASMH vs. BAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASMH vs. BAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF (BAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASMH achieves a 85.33% return, which is significantly higher than BAI's 62.85% return.


ASMH

1D
0.10%
1M
19.55%
YTD
85.33%
6M
88.06%
1Y
160.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BAI

1D
1.94%
1M
13.43%
YTD
62.85%
6M
60.92%
1Y
104.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMH vs. BAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ASMH and BAI is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025

0.63

The correlation between ASMH and BAI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASMH vs. BAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMH
ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

BAI
BAI Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAI Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
BAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAI Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMH vs. BAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF (BAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASMHBAIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.44

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.15

6.50

+3.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.20

17.20

+9.01

ASMH vs. BAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASMH Sharpe Ratio is 3.92, which is higher than the BAI Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASMH and BAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASMH vs. BAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMH drawdown since its inception was -15.89%, smaller than the maximum BAI drawdown of -34.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMH and BAI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASMHBAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.89%

-34.09%

+18.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.89%

-16.22%

+0.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.18%

-6.87%

+2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.14%

6.12%

+0.02%

Volatility

ASMH vs. BAI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) is 15.26%, while iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF (BAI) has a volatility of 18.06%. This indicates that ASMH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASMHBAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.26%

18.06%

-2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.35%

30.25%

+2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.23%

36.45%

+4.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.72%

36.90%

+2.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.72%

36.90%

+2.82%

ASMH vs. BAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BAI's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASMH vs. BAI - Dividend Comparison

ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than BAI's 1.09% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ASMH and BAI have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAI has higher volatility (18.06%) compared to ASMH (15.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASMH dropped -15.89% vs BAI's -34.09%.

On 1-year performance, ASMH leads with 160.23% vs 104.79% for BAI. On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ASMH has been the lower-risk option at 15.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ASMH has performed better with a 160.23% return vs 104.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BAI.

ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 1.09% for BAI.

They also come from different issuers: Precidian Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ASMH and 0.55% for BAI.

ASMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs 2.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASMH and BAI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer