MOBQ vs. LFVN
MOBQ (Mobiquity Technologies Inc) and LFVN (LifeVantage Corporation) are both stocks. MOBQ operates in Advertising Agencies (Communication Services), while LFVN operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, MOBQ returned -47.86%/yr vs -5.92%/yr for LFVN. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MOBQ vs. LFVN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOBQ achieves a -32.58% return, which is significantly lower than LFVN's 1.95% return. Over the past 10 years, MOBQ has underperformed LFVN with an annualized return of -47.86%, while LFVN has yielded a comparatively higher -5.92% annualized return.
MOBQ
- 1D
- -16.82%
- 1M
- 32.84%
- YTD
- -32.58%
- 6M
- -25.83%
- 1Y
- -45.06%
- 3Y*
- -29.24%
- 5Y*
- -62.73%
- 10Y*
- -47.86%
LFVN
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- 10.86%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- -47.43%
- 3Y*
- 15.31%
- 5Y*
- 0.50%
- 10Y*
- -5.92%
MOBQ vs. LFVN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOBQ Mobiquity Technologies Inc | -32.58% | -60.89% | 892.65% | -95.76% | -74.88% | -69.57% | -78.13% | -42.86% | 600.00% | -66.67% |
LFVN LifeVantage Corporation | 1.95% | -64.29% | 197.21% | 74.03% | -39.78% | -32.19% | -40.29% | 18.35% | 177.10% | -41.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOBQ and LFVN is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2011 | 0.04 |
Fundamentals
MOBQ:
-$0.57
LFVN:
$0.45
MOBQ:
16.47
LFVN:
0.41
MOBQ:
$1.15M
LFVN:
$195.32M
MOBQ:
$590.95K
LFVN:
$152.62M
MOBQ:
-$10.76M
LFVN:
$8.69M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOBQ vs. LFVN — Risk / Return Rank
MOBQ
LFVN
MOBQ vs. LFVN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mobiquity Technologies Inc (MOBQ) and LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOBQ | LFVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.92 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | -0.66 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.16 | -0.96 | -0.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOBQ vs. LFVN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOBQ drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum LFVN drawdown of -99.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOBQ and LFVN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOBQ | LFVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -99.57% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.67% | -71.73% | -0.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -95.22% | -83.90% | -11.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.92% | -83.90% | -16.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.99% | -83.90% | -16.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.98% | -93.66% | -6.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.40% | -89.57% | +14.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.89% | 49.42% | -10.53% |
Volatility
MOBQ vs. LFVN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mobiquity Technologies Inc (MOBQ) is 49.37%, while LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) has a volatility of 52.96%. This indicates that MOBQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFVN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOBQ | LFVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 49.37% | 52.96% | -3.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 94.82% | 68.93% | +25.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 128.18% | 77.54% | +50.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 135.75% | 66.39% | +69.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 184.17% | 62.13% | +122.04% |
Dividends
MOBQ vs. LFVN - Dividend Comparison
MOBQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LFVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFVN LifeVantage Corporation | 2.99% | 2.84% | 0.88% | 8.33% | 2.42% |
MOBQ Mobiquity Technologies Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MOBQ vs. LFVN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mobiquity Technologies Inc and LifeVantage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MOBQ and LFVN have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LFVN has higher volatility (52.96%) compared to MOBQ (49.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOBQ dropped -100.00% vs LFVN's -99.57%.
MOBQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.35 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOBQ and LFVN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer