MOBQ vs. LIDRW

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MOBQ (Mobiquity Technologies Inc) and LIDRW (AEye Inc) are both stocks. MOBQ operates in Advertising Agencies (Communication Services), while LIDRW operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 5 years, MOBQ returned -64.66%/yr vs -54.98%/yr for LIDRW. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MOBQ vs. LIDRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mobiquity Technologies Inc (MOBQ) and AEye Inc (LIDRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOBQ achieves a -58.33% return, which is significantly higher than LIDRW's -71.25% return.

MOBQ

• 1D: -10.43%
• 1M: -58.33%
• YTD: -58.33%
• 6M: -65.41%
• 1Y: -61.94%
• 3Y*: -40.03%
• 5Y*: -64.66%
• 10Y*: -51.21%

LIDRW

• 1D: -31.84%
• 1M: -47.99%
• YTD: -71.25%
• 6M: -75.75%
• 1Y: -58.69%
• 3Y*: 4.80%
• 5Y*: -54.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOBQ vs. LIDRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MOBQ Mobiquity Technologies Inc	-58.33%	-60.89%	892.65%	-95.76%	-74.88%	-76.33%
LIDRW AEye Inc	-71.25%	12.62%	1,233.33%	-85.00%	-95.70%	-81.21%

Correlation

The correlation between MOBQ and LIDRW is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2021	0.02

Fundamentals

EPS MOBQ : -$0.57 LIDRW : -$0.98
PS Ratio MOBQ : 10.18 LIDRW : 3.36
Total Revenue (TTM) MOBQ : $1.15M LIDRW : $270.00K
Gross Profit (TTM) MOBQ : $590.95K LIDRW : -$389.00K
EBITDA (TTM) MOBQ : -$10.76M LIDRW : -$35.49M

Return for Risk

MOBQ vs. LIDRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOBQ

MOBQ Risk / Return Rank: 13
MOBQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
MOBQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
MOBQ Omega Ratio Rank: 23
MOBQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
MOBQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2

LIDRW

LIDRW Risk / Return Rank: 46
LIDRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
LIDRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
LIDRW Omega Ratio Rank: 74
LIDRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
LIDRW Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOBQ vs. LIDRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mobiquity Technologies Inc (MOBQ) and AEye Inc (LIDRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MOBQ	LIDRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.52	-0.17	-0.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.38	2.19	-2.57
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.26	-0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.96	-0.54	-0.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.79	-0.74	-1.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MOBQ vs. LIDRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOBQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the LIDRW Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOBQ and LIDRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MOBQ	LIDRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.52	-0.17	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.48	-0.15	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.25	-0.18	-0.07

Drawdowns

MOBQ vs. LIDRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOBQ drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum LIDRW drawdown of -99.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOBQ and LIDRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOBQ	LIDRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-99.93%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.44%	-94.90%	+25.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-96.19%	-94.90%	-1.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.92%	-99.81%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.99%	-99.48%	-0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-75.34%	-92.05%	+16.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.22%	68.57%	-31.35%

Volatility

MOBQ vs. LIDRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mobiquity Technologies Inc (MOBQ) is 21.65%, while AEye Inc (LIDRW) has a volatility of 82.76%. This indicates that MOBQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIDRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MOBQ	LIDRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.65%	82.76%	-61.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	84.50%	203.42%	-118.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	119.31%	351.76%	-232.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	134.14%	359.12%	-224.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	183.48%	349.04%	-165.56%

Dividends

MOBQ vs. LIDRW - Dividend Comparison

Neither MOBQ nor LIDRW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MOBQ and LIDRW in my portfolio?

MOBQ and LIDRW have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MOBQ or LIDRW?

LIDRW has higher volatility (82.76%) compared to MOBQ (21.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOBQ dropped -100.00% vs LIDRW's -99.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIDRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.