MOBQ vs. FNMA

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MOBQ (Mobiquity Technologies Inc) and FNMA (Federal National Mortgage Association) are both stocks. MOBQ operates in Advertising Agencies (Communication Services), while FNMA operates in Mortgage Finance (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, MOBQ returned -51.21%/yr vs 11.76%/yr for FNMA. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MOBQ vs. FNMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mobiquity Technologies Inc (MOBQ) and Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOBQ achieves a -58.33% return, which is significantly lower than FNMA's -34.30% return. Over the past 10 years, MOBQ has underperformed FNMA with an annualized return of -51.21%, while FNMA has yielded a comparatively higher 11.76% annualized return.

MOBQ

• 1D: -10.43%
• 1M: -58.33%
• YTD: -58.33%
• 6M: -65.41%
• 1Y: -61.94%
• 3Y*: -40.03%
• 5Y*: -64.66%
• 10Y*: -51.21%

FNMA

• 1D: -4.99%
• 1M: -13.50%
• YTD: -34.30%
• 6M: -34.48%
• 1Y: -34.60%
• 3Y*: 152.83%
• 5Y*: 25.33%
• 10Y*: 11.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOBQ vs. FNMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MOBQ Mobiquity Technologies Inc	-58.33%	-60.89%	892.65%	-95.76%	-74.88%	-69.57%	-78.13%	-42.86%	600.00%	-66.67%
FNMA Federal National Mortgage Association	-34.30%	227.13%	206.54%	202.77%	-56.90%	-65.69%	-23.40%	194.34%	-60.00%	-32.05%

Correlation

The correlation between MOBQ and FNMA is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2011	0.02

Fundamentals

EPS MOBQ : -$0.57 FNMA : $2.77
PS Ratio MOBQ : 10.18 FNMA : 0.26
Total Revenue (TTM) MOBQ : $1.15M FNMA : $161.03B
Gross Profit (TTM) MOBQ : $590.95K FNMA : $117.99B
EBITDA (TTM) MOBQ : -$10.76M FNMA : $111.39B

Return for Risk

MOBQ vs. FNMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOBQ

MOBQ Risk / Return Rank: 13
MOBQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
MOBQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
MOBQ Omega Ratio Rank: 23
MOBQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
MOBQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2

FNMA

FNMA Risk / Return Rank: 26
FNMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
FNMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
FNMA Omega Ratio Rank: 29
FNMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
FNMA Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOBQ vs. FNMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mobiquity Technologies Inc (MOBQ) and Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MOBQ	FNMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.52	-0.37	-0.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.38	-0.03	-0.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.00	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.96	-0.47	-0.49
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.79	-0.90	-0.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MOBQ vs. FNMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOBQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the FNMA Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOBQ and FNMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MOBQ	FNMA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.52	-0.37	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.48	0.28	-0.76
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.28	0.14	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.25	0.07	-0.33

Drawdowns

MOBQ vs. FNMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOBQ drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum FNMA drawdown of -99.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOBQ and FNMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOBQ	FNMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-99.74%	-0.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.44%	-69.76%	+0.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-96.19%	-69.76%	-26.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.92%	-85.40%	-14.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.99%	-92.13%	-7.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.99%	-90.37%	-9.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-75.34%	-46.16%	-29.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.22%	36.55%	+0.67%

Volatility

MOBQ vs. FNMA - Volatility Comparison

Mobiquity Technologies Inc (MOBQ) has a higher volatility of 21.65% compared to Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) at 16.91%. This indicates that MOBQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MOBQ	FNMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.65%	16.91%	+4.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	84.50%	65.59%	+18.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	119.31%	94.29%	+25.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	134.14%	91.79%	+42.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	183.48%	81.85%	+101.63%

Dividends

MOBQ vs. FNMA - Dividend Comparison

Neither MOBQ nor FNMA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MOBQ and FNMA in my portfolio?

MOBQ and FNMA have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MOBQ or FNMA?

MOBQ has higher volatility (21.65%) compared to FNMA (16.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOBQ dropped -100.00% vs FNMA's -99.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.37 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.