PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOBQ vs. CALM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MOBQ vs. CALM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mobiquity Technologies Inc (MOBQ) and Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (CALM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOBQ achieves a -47.73% return, which is significantly lower than CALM's 11.79% return. Over the past 10 years, MOBQ has underperformed CALM with an annualized return of -48.91%, while CALM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.82% annualized return.


MOBQ

1D
0.00%
1M
-6.14%
6M
-26.60%
YTD
-47.73%
1Y
-50.36%
3Y*
-22.52%
5Y*
-64.36%
10Y*
-48.91%
ALL TIME*
-39.93%

CALM

1D
0.80%
1M
4.69%
6M
5.58%
YTD
11.79%
1Y
-14.37%
3Y*
31.12%
5Y*
26.60%
10Y*
10.82%
ALL TIME*
16.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$107.67M$90.60M$71.32M
$15.81K$26.85K$49.74K

MOBQ vs. CALM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MOBQ
Mobiquity Technologies Inc
-47.73%-60.89%892.65%-95.76%-74.88%-69.57%-78.13%-42.86%600.00%-66.67%
CALM
Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.
11.79%-15.61%87.00%14.48%51.87%-1.38%-12.19%2.09%-3.90%0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between MOBQ and CALM is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2011

0.04

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MOBQ:

$19.19M

CALM:

$4.12B

EPS

MOBQ:

-$0.56

CALM:

$6.63

PS Ratio

MOBQ:

13.18

CALM:

1.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

MOBQ:

$1.15M

CALM:

$2.91B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MOBQ:

$590.95K

CALM:

$672.05M

EBITDA (TTM)

MOBQ:

-$10.76M

CALM:

$515.05M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOBQ vs. CALM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MOBQ
MOBQ Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
MOBQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOBQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOBQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MOBQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOBQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

CALM
CALM Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
CALM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALM Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
CALM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALM Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MOBQ vs. CALM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mobiquity Technologies Inc (MOBQ) and Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (CALM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MOBQCALMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.93

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

-0.46

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.21

-0.66

-0.55

MOBQ vs. CALM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOBQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is comparable to the CALM Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOBQ and CALM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MOBQ vs. CALM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOBQ drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than CALM's maximum drawdown of -74.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOBQ and CALM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOBQCALMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-74.08%

-25.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.67%

-37.00%

-35.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-91.77%

-37.00%

-54.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.91%

-37.00%

-62.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.99%

-39.12%

-60.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.98%

-22.64%

-77.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.58%

-30.29%

-45.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.22%

25.62%

+17.60%

Volatility

MOBQ vs. CALM - Volatility Comparison

Mobiquity Technologies Inc (MOBQ) has a higher volatility of 30.86% compared to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (CALM) at 13.24%. This indicates that MOBQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CALM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOBQCALMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.86%

13.24%

+17.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

92.87%

22.88%

+69.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

130.52%

30.03%

+100.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

136.16%

33.05%

+103.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

183.93%

31.34%

+152.59%

Dividends

MOBQ vs. CALM - Dividend Comparison

MOBQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CALM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CALM
Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.
5.47%10.90%2.82%7.51%3.17%0.09%0.00%0.98%1.03%0.00%2.70%4.10%
MOBQ
Mobiquity Technologies Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MOBQ vs. CALM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mobiquity Technologies Inc and Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MOBQ and CALM have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOBQ has higher volatility (30.86%) compared to CALM (13.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOBQ dropped -100.00% vs CALM's -74.08%.

MOBQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.40 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOBQ and CALM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer