PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNST vs. KMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MNST vs. KMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNST achieves a 21.08% return, which is significantly higher than KMB's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, MNST has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 13.79%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.95% annualized return.


MNST

1D
0.87%
1M
6.59%
YTD
21.08%
6M
25.50%
1Y
47.21%
3Y*
16.85%
5Y*
14.70%
10Y*
13.79%

KMB

1D
0.74%
1M
8.12%
YTD
4.05%
6M
1.77%
1Y
-17.99%
3Y*
-4.95%
5Y*
-0.92%
10Y*
0.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNST vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
21.08%45.87%-8.77%13.48%5.72%3.85%45.52%29.11%-22.23%42.74%
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
4.05%-19.86%11.79%-7.08%-1.58%9.66%0.95%24.57%-2.06%9.04%

Correlation

The correlation between MNST and KMB is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995

0.19

The correlation between MNST and KMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MNST:

$91.74B

KMB:

$34.08B

EPS

MNST:

$2.06

KMB:

$5.93

PE Ratio

MNST:

45.05

KMB:

17.26

PEG Ratio

MNST:

3.52

KMB:

2.98

PS Ratio

MNST:

10.41

KMB:

2.06

PB Ratio

MNST:

10.51

KMB:

18.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

MNST:

$8.79B

KMB:

$16.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MNST:

$4.88B

KMB:

$5.93B

EBITDA (TTM)

MNST:

$2.70B

KMB:

$3.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNST vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNST
MNST Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
MNST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNST Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNST Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MNST Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNST Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

KMB
KMB Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
KMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMB Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
KMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMB Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNST vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MNSTKMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

0.87

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

-0.67

+3.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.37

-1.03

+8.40

MNST vs. KMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNST Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the KMB Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNST and KMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNST vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNST drawdown since its inception was -69.17%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNST and KMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNSTKMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.17%

-36.97%

-32.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.70%

-29.60%

+11.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.04%

-34.06%

+8.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.62%

-34.06%

+7.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.42%

-34.06%

+3.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-26.52%

+26.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.66%

-8.85%

-11.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.22%

19.43%

-13.21%

Volatility

MNST vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is 5.50%, while Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a volatility of 8.42%. This indicates that MNST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNSTKMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

8.42%

-2.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.03%

16.67%

+3.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.43%

25.77%

+0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.60%

20.19%

+4.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.25%

21.07%

+5.18%

Dividends

MNST vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison

MNST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
4.97%5.00%3.72%3.88%3.42%3.19%3.17%3.00%3.51%3.22%3.22%2.77%
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MNST vs. KMB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monster Beverage Corporation and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
2.35B
4.16B
(MNST) Total Revenue
(KMB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MNST vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Monster Beverage Corporation and Kimberly-Clark Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%20222023202420252026
55.0%
36.9%
Portfolio components
MNST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.29B and revenue of 2.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.0%.

KMB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.

MNST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported an operating income of 729.96M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.

KMB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.

MNST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a net income of 569.49M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in a net margin of 24.2%.

KMB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MNST and KMB have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KMB has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to MNST (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNST dropped -69.17% vs KMB's -36.97%.

MNST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNST and KMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer