ML vs. NU
ML (MoneyLion Inc.) and NU (Nu Holdings Ltd.) are both stocks. ML operates in Software - Application (Technology), while NU operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ML vs. NU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ML
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NU
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- YTD
- -27.18%
- 6M
- -27.87%
- 1Y
- 1.58%
- 3Y*
- 17.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ML vs. NU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ML MoneyLion Inc. | 0.00% | -0.13% | 37.20% | 237.04% | -84.62% | 1.26% |
NU Nu Holdings Ltd. | -27.18% | 61.58% | 24.37% | 104.67% | -56.61% | -16.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between ML and NU is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2021 | 0.32 |
The correlation between ML and NU shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (3 years) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ML:
$545.91M
NU:
$17.54B
ML:
$409.26M
NU:
$7.67B
ML:
$56.96M
NU:
$4.14B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ML vs. NU — Risk / Return Rank
ML
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NU
ML vs. NU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MoneyLion Inc. (ML) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ML | NU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.04 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.04 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.10 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ML vs. NU - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ML | NU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -72.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -38.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -35.02% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -29.77% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.36% | — |
Volatility
ML vs. NU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ML | NU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 38.77% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 58.48% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 58.48% | — |
Dividends
ML vs. NU - Dividend Comparison
Neither ML nor NU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ML vs. NU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MoneyLion Inc. and Nu Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ML and NU have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ML and NU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer