ML vs. DAVE

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MoneyLion Inc. (ML) and Dave Inc. (DAVE).

Performance

ML vs. DAVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MoneyLion Inc. (ML) and Dave Inc. (DAVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ML vs. DAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ML MoneyLion Inc.	0.00%	-0.13%	37.20%	237.04%	-84.62%	-59.62%
DAVE Dave Inc.	-21.37%	154.73%	936.61%	-9.64%	-97.17%	4.59%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) ML : $545.91M DAVE : $511.91M
Gross Profit (TTM) ML : $409.26M DAVE : $408.56M
EBITDA (TTM) ML : $56.96M DAVE : $143.27M

Returns By Period

ML

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DAVE

• 1D: 2.73%
• 1M: -9.92%
• YTD: -21.37%
• 6M: -12.67%
• 1Y: 110.61%
• 3Y*: 206.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ML vs. DAVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAVE

DAVE Risk / Return Rank: 80
DAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
DAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 79
DAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
DAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ML vs. DAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MoneyLion Inc. (ML) and Dave Inc. (DAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ML	DAVE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.12	—

Correlation

The correlation between ML and DAVE is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ML vs. DAVE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ML nor DAVE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ML	DAVE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-99.01%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-44.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-61.96%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-69.90%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	23.73%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ML	DAVE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	17.42%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	49.64%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	85.60%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	98.22%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	98.22%	—

Financials