PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ML vs. DAVE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


MLDAVE
YTD Return38.06%648.96%
1Y Return185.08%1,107.69%
3Y Return (Ann)-20.98%-41.95%
Sharpe Ratio1.888.92
Sortino Ratio2.555.66
Omega Ratio1.321.72
Calmar Ratio1.9110.22
Martin Ratio5.3248.57
Ulcer Index32.97%20.81%
Daily Std Dev93.26%113.27%
Max Drawdown-97.57%-99.01%
Current Drawdown-76.68%-86.28%

Fundamentals


MLDAVE
Market Cap$960.81M$795.63M
EPS$0.27$2.04
PE Ratio320.5630.78
Total Revenue (TTM)$500.28M$226.95M
Gross Profit (TTM)$244.02M$131.36M
EBITDA (TTM)$38.51M$17.97M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between ML and DAVE is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

ML vs. DAVE - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ML achieves a 38.06% return, which is significantly lower than DAVE's 648.96% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.68%
26.37%
ML
DAVE

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ML vs. DAVE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MoneyLion Inc. (ML) and Dave Inc. (DAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ML
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ML, currently valued at 1.88, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.88
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ML, currently valued at 2.55, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.55
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ML, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.32
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ML, currently valued at 1.93, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.93
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ML, currently valued at 5.32, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.005.32
DAVE
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DAVE, currently valued at 8.92, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.008.92
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for DAVE, currently valued at 5.66, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.005.66
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for DAVE, currently valued at 1.72, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.72
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for DAVE, currently valued at 10.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.0010.22
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for DAVE, currently valued at 48.57, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0048.57

ML vs. DAVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ML Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the DAVE Sharpe Ratio of 8.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ML and DAVE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.002.004.006.008.0010.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.88
8.92
ML
DAVE

Dividends

ML vs. DAVE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ML nor DAVE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ML vs. DAVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ML drawdown since its inception was -97.57%, roughly equal to the maximum DAVE drawdown of -99.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ML and DAVE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-90.00%-85.00%-80.00%-75.00%-70.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-73.19%
-86.28%
ML
DAVE

Volatility

ML vs. DAVE - Volatility Comparison

MoneyLion Inc. (ML) and Dave Inc. (DAVE) have volatilities of 32.53% and 33.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
32.53%
33.23%
ML
DAVE

Financials

ML vs. DAVE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MoneyLion Inc. and Dave Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items