ML vs. MARA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MoneyLion Inc. (ML) and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA).

Performance

ML vs. MARA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MoneyLion Inc. (ML) and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ML vs. MARA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ML MoneyLion Inc.	0.00%	-0.13%	37.20%	237.04%	-84.62%	-64.34%	15.31%
MARA Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.	-9.13%	-46.45%	-28.61%	586.84%	-89.59%	214.75%	169.77%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) ML : $545.91M MARA : $907.09M
Gross Profit (TTM) ML : $409.26M MARA : $576.49M
EBITDA (TTM) ML : $56.96M MARA : -$559.37M

Returns By Period

ML

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MARA

• 1D: 4.68%
• 1M: -8.72%
• YTD: -9.13%
• 6M: -55.31%
• 1Y: -29.04%
• 3Y*: -2.19%
• 5Y*: -30.09%
• 10Y*: -12.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ML vs. MARA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARA

MARA Risk / Return Rank: 28
MARA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
MARA Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
MARA Omega Ratio Rank: 30
MARA Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
MARA Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ML vs. MARA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MoneyLion Inc. (ML) and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ML	MARA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.11	—

Correlation

The correlation between ML and MARA is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ML vs. MARA - Dividend Comparison

Neither ML nor MARA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ML	MARA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-99.74%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-70.53%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-95.87%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-99.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-94.73%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-77.82%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	36.95%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ML	MARA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	25.28%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	61.57%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	81.91%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	107.54%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	144.05%	—

Financials