MIMI vs. ET

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

MIMI (Mint Incorporation Ltd) and ET (Energy Transfer LP) are both stocks. MIMI operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while ET operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past year, MIMI returned -96.99% vs 21.31% for ET. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MIMI vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mint Incorporation Ltd (MIMI) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIMI achieves a -28.33% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 23.55% return.

MIMI

• 1D: 7.50%
• 1M: -22.38%
• 6M: -35.16%
• YTD: -28.33%
• 1Y: -96.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ET

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 3.09%
• 6M: 20.13%
• YTD: 23.55%
• 1Y: 21.31%
• 3Y*: 24.40%
• 5Y*: 22.47%
• 10Y*: 10.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIMI vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MIMI Mint Incorporation Ltd	-28.33%	-93.18%
ET Energy Transfer LP	23.55%	-10.01%

Correlation

The correlation between MIMI and ET is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2025	0.03

Fundamentals

Market Cap MIMI : $5.38M ET : $67.65B
EPS MIMI : -$0.11 ET : $1.35
PS Ratio MIMI : 24.17 ET : 0.79
Total Revenue (TTM) MIMI : $2.22M ET : $89.38B
Gross Profit (TTM) MIMI : $328.32K ET : $20.48B
EBITDA (TTM) MIMI : -$2.88M ET : $13.02B

Return for Risk

MIMI vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIMI

MIMI Risk / Return Rank: 12
MIMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
MIMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
MIMI Omega Ratio Rank: 9
MIMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
MIMI Martin Ratio Rank: 16

ET

ET Risk / Return Rank: 80
ET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
ET Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
ET Omega Ratio Rank: 76
ET Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
ET Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIMI vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mint Incorporation Ltd (MIMI) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MIMI	ET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	1.34	-1.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.32	2.05	-3.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.23	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	2.51	-3.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.20	5.46	-6.66

MIMI vs. ET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIMI Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIMI and ET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MIMI vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIMI drawdown since its inception was -98.14%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIMI and ET.

Drawdown Indicators

	MIMI	ET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.14%	-87.81%	-10.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-98.14%	-8.59%	-89.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.56%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.56%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-72.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.00%	-3.58%	-94.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-54.18%	-25.65%	-28.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	80.73%	3.94%	+76.79%

Volatility

MIMI vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Mint Incorporation Ltd (MIMI) has a higher volatility of 34.31% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.11%. This indicates that MIMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MIMI	ET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	34.31%	5.11%	+29.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	116.33%	12.29%	+104.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	201.86%	16.12%	+185.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	171.71%	24.59%	+147.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	171.71%	34.33%	+137.38%

Dividends

MIMI vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

MIMI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.79%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ET Energy Transfer LP	6.79%	7.97%	6.51%	8.95%	7.33%	7.41%	17.27%	9.51%	9.24%	6.66%	5.90%	7.42%
MIMI Mint Incorporation Ltd	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MIMI and ET in my portfolio?

MIMI and ET have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MIMI or ET?

MIMI has higher volatility (34.31%) compared to ET (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIMI dropped -98.14% vs ET's -87.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.