PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIDU vs. QLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIDU vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIDU achieves a 37.63% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 42.06% return. Over the past 10 years, MIDU has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of 11.92%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 36.10% annualized return.


MIDU

1D
-0.19%
1M
10.56%
YTD
37.63%
6M
36.96%
1Y
65.54%
3Y*
26.41%
5Y*
2.59%
10Y*
11.92%

QLD

1D
-0.53%
1M
21.54%
YTD
42.06%
6M
37.45%
1Y
85.49%
3Y*
50.15%
5Y*
25.75%
10Y*
36.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIDU vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIDU
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares
37.63%-2.75%20.32%27.79%-49.27%72.89%-18.31%77.38%-39.21%46.86%
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
42.06%30.36%42.82%117.72%-60.52%54.67%88.90%81.69%-8.31%70.34%

Correlation

The correlation between MIDU and QLD is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2009

0.75

The correlation between MIDU and QLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MIDU vs. QLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MIDU
QLD

Industrials

25.0%
2.8%

Technology

15.7%
53.8%

Financial Services

14.4%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
12.3%

Healthcare

8.6%
4.2%

Real Estate

7.5%
0.1%

Energy

5.5%
0.6%

Basic Materials

4.8%
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
7.7%

Utilities

3.1%
1.4%

Communication Services

1.0%
15.8%

Industrials

MIDU
25.0%
QLD
2.8%

Technology

MIDU
15.7%
QLD
53.8%

Financial Services

MIDU
14.4%
QLD
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

MIDU
10.7%
QLD
12.3%

Healthcare

MIDU
8.6%
QLD
4.2%

Real Estate

MIDU
7.5%
QLD
0.1%

Energy

MIDU
5.5%
QLD
0.6%

Basic Materials

MIDU
4.8%
QLD
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

MIDU
3.8%
QLD
7.7%

Utilities

MIDU
3.1%
QLD
1.4%

Communication Services

MIDU
1.0%
QLD
15.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIDU vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIDU
MIDU Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
MIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

QLD
QLD Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIDU vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MIDUQLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.41

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

3.42

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.47

11.92

-3.44

MIDU vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIDU Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDU and QLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MIDUQLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

2.70

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.58

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.81

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.60

-0.25

Drawdowns

MIDU vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDU drawdown since its inception was -86.26%, roughly equal to the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDU and QLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIDUQLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.26%

-83.13%

-3.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.80%

-25.13%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.41%

-42.29%

-18.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.14%

-63.68%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.26%

-63.68%

-22.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.20%

-0.53%

-3.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.44%

-18.17%

-4.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.76%

7.20%

+0.56%

Volatility

MIDU vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) has a higher volatility of 12.93% compared to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) at 8.90%. This indicates that MIDU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIDUQLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.93%

8.90%

+4.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.72%

24.08%

+9.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.41%

31.85%

+14.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.44%

44.74%

+14.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.60%

44.56%

+19.04%

MIDU vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIDU has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIDU vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

MIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than QLD's 0.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MIDU
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.65%1.04%1.10%1.43%0.11%0.00%0.06%0.71%0.70%2.67%1.89%0.00%
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
0.12%0.17%0.25%0.33%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.06%0.02%0.21%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIDU and QLD have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MIDU has higher volatility (12.93%) compared to QLD (8.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDU dropped -86.26% vs QLD's -83.13%.

On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 36.10% vs 11.92% for MIDU. On fees, QLD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, QLD has been the lower-risk option at 8.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 36.10% return vs 11.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QLD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MIDU.

MIDU has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.12% for QLD.

MIDU tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%), while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MIDU and 0.95% for QLD.

QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIDU and QLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer