PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGV vs. VLUE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGV vs. VLUE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGV achieves a 14.01% return, which is significantly lower than VLUE's 47.08% return. Over the past 10 years, MGV has underperformed VLUE with an annualized return of 12.84%, while VLUE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.20% annualized return.


MGV

1D
0.77%
1M
4.80%
YTD
14.01%
6M
14.90%
1Y
28.63%
3Y*
19.33%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*
12.84%

VLUE

1D
-1.29%
1M
15.14%
YTD
47.08%
6M
50.18%
1Y
89.43%
3Y*
33.96%
5Y*
16.06%
10Y*
15.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGV vs. VLUE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
14.01%15.45%16.94%9.16%-1.22%25.93%2.50%25.54%-4.13%16.85%
VLUE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
47.08%32.67%7.25%14.26%-14.17%28.93%-0.23%27.20%-11.13%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between MGV and VLUE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2013

0.88

The correlation between MGV and VLUE shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.90 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MGV vs. VLUE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MGV
VLUE

Financial Services

23.9%
10.4%

Healthcare

16.6%
8.5%

Technology

14.2%
44.5%

Industrials

13.7%
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

11.9%
4.0%

Energy

6.6%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

3.7%
8.3%

Communication Services

3.4%
8.3%

Utilities

2.6%
2.0%

Basic Materials

2.4%
1.6%

Real Estate

1.2%
1.8%

Financial Services

MGV
23.9%
VLUE
10.4%

Healthcare

MGV
16.6%
VLUE
8.5%

Technology

MGV
14.2%
VLUE
44.5%

Industrials

MGV
13.7%
VLUE
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

MGV
11.9%
VLUE
4.0%

Energy

MGV
6.6%
VLUE
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

MGV
3.7%
VLUE
8.3%

Communication Services

MGV
3.4%
VLUE
8.3%

Utilities

MGV
2.6%
VLUE
2.0%

Basic Materials

MGV
2.4%
VLUE
1.6%

Real Estate

MGV
1.2%
VLUE
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGV vs. VLUE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGV
MGV Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

VLUE
VLUE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
VLUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLUE Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
VLUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLUE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGV vs. VLUE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGVVLUEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.88

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.48

9.95

-5.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.05

44.54

-27.49

MGV vs. VLUE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGV Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is lower than the VLUE Sharpe Ratio of 5.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGV and VLUE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGVVLUEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93

5.19

-2.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.91

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.77

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.76

-0.27

Drawdowns

MGV vs. VLUE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGV drawdown since its inception was -55.87%, which is greater than VLUE's maximum drawdown of -39.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGV and VLUE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGVVLUEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.87%

-39.47%

-16.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.42%

-9.04%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.18%

-17.89%

+4.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.54%

-27.12%

+10.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.41%

-39.47%

+4.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.70%

+1.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.69%

-6.01%

-1.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

2.01%

-0.33%

Volatility

MGV vs. VLUE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) is 2.37%, while iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) has a volatility of 7.83%. This indicates that MGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLUE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGVVLUEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.37%

7.83%

-5.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.49%

14.06%

-6.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.85%

17.34%

-7.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.57%

17.79%

-4.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.33%

19.82%

-3.49%

MGV vs. VLUE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VLUE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MGV vs. VLUE - Dividend Comparison

MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than VLUE's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
1.87%2.04%2.31%2.48%2.45%2.17%2.47%2.69%2.65%2.34%2.53%2.59%
VLUE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
1.42%2.11%2.73%2.66%3.18%2.22%2.42%2.61%2.70%2.14%2.07%2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGV and VLUE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VLUE has higher volatility (7.83%) compared to MGV (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGV dropped -55.87% vs VLUE's -39.47%.

On 10-year performance, VLUE leads with 15.20% vs 12.84% for MGV. On fees, MGV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 2.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VLUE has performed better with a 15.20% return vs 12.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VLUE.

MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.42% for VLUE.

MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while VLUE tracks MSCI USA Value Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGV and 0.15% for VLUE.

VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.19 vs 2.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGV and VLUE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer