PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGV vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGV vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGV achieves a 16.85% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.41% return. Over the past 10 years, MGV has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 13.43%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.48% annualized return.


MGV

1D
1.09%
1M
4.51%
YTD
16.85%
6M
16.55%
1Y
30.47%
3Y*
19.86%
5Y*
13.34%
10Y*
13.43%

QQQ

1D
-0.25%
1M
2.96%
YTD
20.41%
6M
19.46%
1Y
40.91%
3Y*
27.47%
5Y*
16.94%
10Y*
22.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGV vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
16.85%15.45%16.94%9.16%-1.22%25.93%2.50%25.54%-4.13%16.85%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
20.41%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between MGV and QQQ is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between MGV and QQQ has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MGV vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MGV
QQQ

Financial Services

22.8%
0.2%

Technology

18.5%
58.7%

Healthcare

16.0%
3.7%

Industrials

13.2%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

11.0%
6.4%

Energy

6.0%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

3.4%
11.4%

Communication Services

3.2%
14.3%

Basic Materials

2.3%
1.0%

Utilities

2.3%
1.2%

Real Estate

1.2%
0.1%

Financial Services

MGV
22.8%
QQQ
0.2%

Technology

MGV
18.5%
QQQ
58.7%

Healthcare

MGV
16.0%
QQQ
3.7%

Industrials

MGV
13.2%
QQQ
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

MGV
11.0%
QQQ
6.4%

Energy

MGV
6.0%
QQQ
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

MGV
3.4%
QQQ
11.4%

Communication Services

MGV
3.2%
QQQ
14.3%

Basic Materials

MGV
2.3%
QQQ
1.0%

Utilities

MGV
2.3%
QQQ
1.2%

Real Estate

MGV
1.2%
QQQ
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGV vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGV
MGV Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGV vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGVQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.41

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.77

3.44

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.12

12.79

+5.33

MGV vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGV Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGV and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGV vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGV drawdown since its inception was -56.07%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGV and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGVQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.07%

-82.97%

+26.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.42%

-11.96%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.18%

-22.77%

+9.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.54%

-35.12%

+18.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.41%

-35.12%

-0.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.99%

+0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-32.73%

+24.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

3.21%

-1.52%

Volatility

MGV vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) is 3.32%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 8.47%. This indicates that MGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGVQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

8.47%

-5.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.77%

14.20%

-6.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.15%

17.67%

-7.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.57%

22.64%

-9.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.36%

22.43%

-6.07%

MGV vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MGV vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than QQQ's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
1.82%2.04%2.31%2.48%2.45%2.17%2.47%2.69%2.65%2.34%2.53%2.59%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.49%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGV and QQQ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to MGV (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGV dropped -56.07% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.48% vs 13.43% for MGV. On fees, MGV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 3.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.48% return vs 13.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.

MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.49% for QQQ.

MGV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGV and 0.18% for QQQ.

MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGV and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer