MGV vs. FELG

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

MGV (Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF) and FELG (Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MGV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index, while FELG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. MGV is passively managed, while FELG is actively managed. Over the past year, MGV returned 28.69% vs 22.20% for FELG. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MGV charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for FELG.

Performance

MGV vs. FELG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGV achieves a 15.50% return, which is significantly higher than FELG's 3.31% return.

MGV

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 4.18%
• YTD: 15.50%
• 6M: 15.37%
• 1Y: 28.69%
• 3Y*: 18.98%
• 5Y*: 12.53%
• 10Y*: 13.15%

FELG

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -3.56%
• YTD: 3.31%
• 6M: 4.10%
• 1Y: 22.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGV vs. FELG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF	15.50%	15.45%	16.94%	6.37%
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF	3.31%	18.44%	35.45%	4.37%

Correlation

The correlation between MGV and FELG is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2023	0.46

MGV vs. FELG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MGV	FELG
Financial Services	23.9%	4.3%
Healthcare	16.6%	6.4%
Technology	14.2%	56.0%
Industrials	13.7%	5.8%
Consumer Defensive	11.9%	1.2%
Energy	6.6%	0.6%
Consumer Cyclical	3.7%	11.4%
Communication Services	3.4%	12.2%
Utilities	2.6%	1.0%
Basic Materials	2.4%	0.0%
Real Estate	1.2%	0.1%

Return for Risk

MGV vs. FELG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGV

MGV Risk / Return Rank: 90
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 89
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FELG

FELG Risk / Return Rank: 36
FELG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FELG Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FELG Omega Ratio Rank: 39
FELG Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
FELG Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGV vs. FELG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MGV	FELG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.76	1.29	+1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.92	1.79	+2.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.23	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.36	1.28	+3.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.56	4.30	+12.26

MGV vs. FELG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGV Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is higher than the FELG Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGV and FELG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MGV vs. FELG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGV drawdown since its inception was -56.07%, which is greater than FELG's maximum drawdown of -23.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGV and FELG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MGV	FELG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.07%	-23.89%	-32.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.42%	-16.17%	+9.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.36%	+5.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.78%	-3.53%	-4.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.69%	4.79%	-3.10%

Volatility

MGV vs. FELG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) is 3.33%, while Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that MGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FELG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MGV	FELG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	5.41%	-2.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.77%	12.43%	-4.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.13%	16.04%	-5.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.61%	19.97%	-6.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.35%	19.97%	-3.62%

MGV vs. FELG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FELG's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MGV vs. FELG - Dividend Comparison

MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than FELG's 0.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF	0.35%	0.38%	0.44%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF	1.85%	2.04%	2.31%	2.48%	2.45%	2.17%	2.47%	2.69%	2.65%	2.34%	2.53%	2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MGV and FELG in my portfolio?

MGV and FELG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MGV or FELG?

FELG has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to MGV (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGV dropped -56.07% vs FELG's -23.89%.

Which ETF is better, MGV or FELG?

On 1-year performance, MGV leads with 28.69% vs 22.20% for FELG. On fees, MGV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MGV or FELG?

Over the 1-year period, MGV has performed better with a 28.69% return vs 22.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MGV or FELG?

MGV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for FELG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MGV or FELG?

MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 0.35% for FELG.

What is the main difference between MGV and FELG?

MGV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FELG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGV and 0.18% for FELG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.