FELG vs. QQQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FELG (Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FELG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. FELG is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. Over the past year, FELG returned 27.58% vs 41.82% for QQQ. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.

Performance

FELG vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FELG achieves a 7.70% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.

FELG

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 5.85%
• YTD: 7.70%
• 6M: 7.23%
• 1Y: 27.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQ

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 10.60%
• YTD: 21.30%
• 6M: 19.66%
• 1Y: 41.82%
• 3Y*: 28.78%
• 5Y*: 17.97%
• 10Y*: 21.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FELG vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF	7.70%	18.44%	35.45%	4.20%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	21.30%	20.77%	25.58%	5.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FELG and QQQ is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023	0.96

The correlation between FELG and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FELG vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FELG	QQQ
Technology	53.9%	53.8%
Communication Services	13.8%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	11.5%	12.3%
Industrials	7.2%	2.8%
Healthcare	6.3%	4.2%
Financial Services	4.7%	0.2%
Energy	1.1%	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	1.0%	7.7%
Basic Materials	0.5%	1.1%
Utilities	0.1%	1.4%
Real Estate	0.0%	0.1%

Return for Risk

FELG vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FELG

FELG Risk / Return Rank: 44
FELG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FELG Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
FELG Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FELG Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
FELG Martin Ratio Rank: 37

QQQ

QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 73
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 74
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FELG vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FELG	QQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	2.64	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	3.45	-1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.45	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.71	3.51	-1.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.86	13.49	-7.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FELG vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FELG Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FELG and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FELG	QQQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	2.64	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.99	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.32	0.41	+0.91

Drawdowns

FELG vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FELG drawdown since its inception was -23.89%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELG and QQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FELG	QQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.89%	-82.97%	+59.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.17%	-11.96%	-4.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	-0.26%	-1.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.52%	-32.79%	+29.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.72%	3.11%	+1.61%

Volatility

FELG vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) is 3.50%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that FELG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FELG	QQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.50%	4.49%	-0.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.59%	12.10%	-0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.46%	15.94%	-0.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.89%	22.38%	-2.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.89%	22.29%	-2.40%

FELG vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FELG and QQQ have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FELG vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

FELG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than QQQ's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF	0.34%	0.38%	0.44%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	0.38%	0.45%	0.56%	0.62%	0.80%	0.43%	0.55%	0.74%	0.91%	0.84%	1.06%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FELG and QQQ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, FELG and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FELG or QQQ?

QQQ has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to FELG (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FELG dropped -23.89% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

Which ETF is better, FELG or QQQ?

On 1-year performance, QQQ leads with 41.82% vs 27.58% for FELG. Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. On volatility, FELG has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FELG or QQQ?

Over the 1-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 41.82% return vs 27.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FELG or QQQ?

FELG and QQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FELG or QQQ?

QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.34% for FELG.

What is the main difference between FELG and QQQ?

FELG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.