PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGK vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGK vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGK achieves a 7.10% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 14.80% return. Over the past 10 years, MGK has outperformed VYM with an annualized return of 18.41%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.68% annualized return.


MGK

1D
2.22%
1M
1.43%
6M
8.75%
YTD
7.10%
1Y
19.10%
3Y*
23.88%
5Y*
13.45%
10Y*
18.41%
ALL TIME*
13.49%

VYM

1D
0.51%
1M
2.08%
6M
9.09%
YTD
14.80%
1Y
25.54%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
11.68%
ALL TIME*
9.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$120.45M$120.74M$143.14M
$204.09M$201.36M$203.61M

MGK vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
7.10%20.67%32.94%51.67%-33.59%28.58%41.01%37.38%-2.91%29.49%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
14.80%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between MGK and VYM is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between MGK and VYM has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MGK vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MGK
VYM

Technology

58.7%
17.8%

Communication Services

16.4%
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
6.8%

Healthcare

4.9%
13.2%

Financial Services

4.0%
21.0%

Industrials

2.7%
12.6%

Real Estate

1.2%
0.0%

Utilities

1.0%
5.7%

Basic Materials

0.4%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

0.4%
8.1%

Energy

-

8.6%

Technology

MGK
58.7%
VYM
17.8%

Communication Services

MGK
16.4%
VYM
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

MGK
11.3%
VYM
6.8%

Healthcare

MGK
4.9%
VYM
13.2%

Financial Services

MGK
4.0%
VYM
21.0%

Industrials

MGK
2.7%
VYM
12.6%

Real Estate

MGK
1.2%
VYM
0.0%

Utilities

MGK
1.0%
VYM
5.7%

Basic Materials

MGK
0.4%
VYM
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

MGK
0.4%
VYM
8.1%

Energy

MGK

-

VYM
8.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGK vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MGK
MGK Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
MGK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGK Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
MGK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGK Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MGK vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGKVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.46

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

3.83

-2.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.54

14.40

-10.86

MGK vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGK Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGK and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGK vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGK drawdown since its inception was -48.43%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGK and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGKVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.43%

-56.98%

+8.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.85%

-6.69%

-10.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.36%

-14.46%

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.01%

-15.84%

-20.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.01%

-35.21%

-0.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.04%

-0.64%

-3.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-7.14%

-0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.40%

1.78%

+3.62%

Volatility

MGK vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) has a higher volatility of 6.24% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.40%. This indicates that MGK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGKVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.24%

2.40%

+3.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.80%

7.43%

+7.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.27%

10.19%

+8.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.96%

13.87%

+9.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.03%

16.30%

+5.73%

MGK vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MGK vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

MGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than VYM's 2.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
0.33%0.35%0.43%0.50%0.70%0.41%0.65%0.85%1.12%1.23%1.53%1.43%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.23%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGK and VYM have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGK has higher volatility (6.24%) compared to VYM (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGK dropped -48.43% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, MGK leads with 18.41% vs 11.68% for VYM. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MGK has performed better with a 18.41% return vs 11.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for MGK.

VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 0.33% for MGK.

MGK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VYM is Dividend. MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGK and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGK and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer