MFUS vs. MFDX
MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) and MFDX (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index, while MFDX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MFUS returned 12.86%/yr vs 10.04%/yr for MFDX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFUS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for MFDX.
Performance
MFUS vs. MFDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFUS achieves a 16.59% return, which is significantly higher than MFDX's 10.33% return.
MFUS
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 16.59%
- 6M
- 16.69%
- 1Y
- 28.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- —
MFDX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 10.33%
- 6M
- 12.61%
- 1Y
- 23.30%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 10.04%
- 10Y*
- —
MFUS vs. MFDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 16.59% | 16.02% | 20.17% | 12.19% | -5.82% | 24.10% | 10.64% | 26.17% | -7.30% | 11.20% |
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF | 10.33% | 34.27% | 4.40% | 17.54% | -10.27% | 11.07% | 6.90% | 19.88% | -14.88% | 7.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFUS and MFDX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017 | 0.78 |
The correlation between MFUS and MFDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
MFUS vs. MFDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MFUS
MFDX
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
MFUS
MFDX
Healthcare
MFUS
MFDX
Industrials
MFUS
MFDX
Financial Services
MFUS
MFDX
Consumer Cyclical
MFUS
MFDX
Consumer Defensive
MFUS
MFDX
Energy
MFUS
MFDX
Communication Services
MFUS
MFDX
Basic Materials
MFUS
MFDX
Real Estate
MFUS
MFDX
Utilities
MFUS
MFDX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFUS vs. MFDX — Risk / Return Rank
MFUS
MFDX
MFUS vs. MFDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFUS | MFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.31 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.51 | 2.19 | +2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.52 | 8.72 | +9.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFUS | MFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | 1.71 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.67 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.55 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
MFUS vs. MFDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFUS drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, roughly equal to the maximum MFDX drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUS and MFDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFUS | MFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.21% | -36.05% | +0.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.39% | -10.66% | +4.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.39% | -11.62% | -3.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.22% | -25.58% | +7.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.30% | +1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -6.50% | +2.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 2.68% | -1.13% |
Volatility
MFUS vs. MFDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) is 2.97%, while PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that MFUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFUS | MFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 4.31% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.22% | 11.35% | -3.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.71% | 13.69% | -2.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 15.03% | 0.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 16.41% | +0.94% |
MFUS vs. MFDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFUS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MFDX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFUS vs. MFDX - Dividend Comparison
MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than MFDX's 2.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF | 2.78% | 2.97% | 3.16% | 3.12% | 2.85% | 2.99% | 1.58% | 2.88% | 2.13% | 0.71% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFUS and MFDX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFDX has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to MFUS (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFUS dropped -35.21% vs MFDX's -36.05%.
On 5-year performance, MFUS leads with 12.86% vs 10.04% for MFDX. On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, MFUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 12.86% return vs 10.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MFDX.
MFDX has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 1.35% for MFUS.
MFUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MFDX is Foreign Large Cap Equities. MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index, while MFDX tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for MFUS and 0.39% for MFDX.
MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFUS and MFDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer