PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MFDX vs. QVML
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MFDX and QVML is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.7

Performance

MFDX vs. QVML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
22.48%
32.05%
MFDX
QVML

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MFDX:

0.87

QVML:

0.31

Sortino Ratio

MFDX:

1.29

QVML:

0.56

Omega Ratio

MFDX:

1.17

QVML:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

MFDX:

1.15

QVML:

0.32

Martin Ratio

MFDX:

3.14

QVML:

1.46

Ulcer Index

MFDX:

4.27%

QVML:

4.03%

Daily Std Dev

MFDX:

15.42%

QVML:

19.26%

Max Drawdown

MFDX:

-35.50%

QVML:

-23.53%

Current Drawdown

MFDX:

-1.94%

QVML:

-13.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFDX achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly higher than QVML's -8.91% return.


MFDX

YTD

9.45%

1M

-1.94%

6M

2.59%

1Y

13.44%

5Y*

12.53%

10Y*

N/A

QVML

YTD

-8.91%

1M

-7.29%

6M

-9.00%

1Y

6.88%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MFDX vs. QVML - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFDX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than QVML's 0.11% expense ratio.


MFDX
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF
Expense ratio chart for MFDX: current value is 0.39%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
MFDX: 0.39%
Expense ratio chart for QVML: current value is 0.11%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
QVML: 0.11%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MFDX vs. QVML — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFDX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MFDX is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MFDX is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MFDX is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MFDX is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MFDX is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MFDX is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

QVML
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QVML is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QVML is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QVML is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QVML is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QVML is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QVML is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MFDX vs. QVML - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MFDX, currently valued at 0.87, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
MFDX: 0.87
QVML: 0.31
The chart of Sortino ratio for MFDX, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
MFDX: 1.29
QVML: 0.56
The chart of Omega ratio for MFDX, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
MFDX: 1.17
QVML: 1.08
The chart of Calmar ratio for MFDX, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
MFDX: 1.15
QVML: 0.32
The chart of Martin ratio for MFDX, currently valued at 3.14, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
MFDX: 3.14
QVML: 1.46

The current MFDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the QVML Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFDX and QVML, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.87
0.31
MFDX
QVML

Dividends

MFDX vs. QVML - Dividend Comparison

MFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than QVML's 1.32% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
MFDX
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF
3.19%3.16%3.12%2.85%2.99%1.58%2.88%2.98%0.71%
QVML
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
1.32%1.15%1.43%1.72%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MFDX vs. QVML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFDX drawdown since its inception was -35.50%, which is greater than QVML's maximum drawdown of -23.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFDX and QVML. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-1.94%
-13.55%
MFDX
QVML

Volatility

MFDX vs. QVML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) is 9.67%, while Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) has a volatility of 14.23%. This indicates that MFDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QVML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
9.67%
14.23%
MFDX
QVML
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab