MFUS vs. VOOV

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) and VOOV (Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index​, while VOOV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MFUS returned 13.48%/yr vs 11.39%/yr for VOOV. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MFUS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VOOV.

Performance

MFUS vs. VOOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFUS achieves a 18.31% return, which is significantly higher than VOOV's 7.89% return.

MFUS

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 3.47%
• YTD: 18.31%
• 6M: 17.50%
• 1Y: 30.42%
• 3Y*: 22.30%
• 5Y*: 13.48%
• 10Y*: —

VOOV

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -0.07%
• YTD: 7.89%
• 6M: 7.27%
• 1Y: 21.39%
• 3Y*: 15.29%
• 5Y*: 11.39%
• 10Y*: 12.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFUS vs. VOOV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF	18.31%	16.02%	20.17%	12.19%	-5.82%	24.10%	10.64%	26.17%	-7.30%	11.20%
VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF	7.89%	13.10%	12.21%	22.15%	-5.37%	24.87%	1.23%	31.75%	-9.09%	10.47%

Correlation

The correlation between MFUS and VOOV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2017	0.90

The correlation between MFUS and VOOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

MFUS vs. VOOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MFUS	VOOV
Technology	24.7%	19.0%
Healthcare	13.4%	11.6%
Industrials	12.2%	11.0%
Financial Services	12.0%	15.0%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	11.1%
Consumer Defensive	9.7%	9.5%
Energy	6.4%	7.6%
Communication Services	5.1%	3.3%
Basic Materials	2.8%	3.5%
Real Estate	1.7%	3.4%
Utilities	1.6%	4.6%

Return for Risk

MFUS vs. VOOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFUS

MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 87
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 85
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 90

VOOV

VOOV Risk / Return Rank: 69
VOOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
VOOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
VOOV Omega Ratio Rank: 67
VOOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
VOOV Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFUS vs. VOOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MFUS	VOOV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.73	2.16	+0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.86	2.98	+0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.38	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.79	3.43	+1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.46	13.00	+6.45

MFUS vs. VOOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the VOOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFUS and VOOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MFUS vs. VOOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFUS drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, smaller than the maximum VOOV drawdown of -37.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUS and VOOV.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFUS	VOOV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.21%	-37.31%	+2.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.39%	-6.27%	-0.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.39%	-17.55%	+2.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.22%	-18.10%	-0.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	-0.92%	+0.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.98%	-3.83%	-0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.57%	1.65%	-0.08%

Volatility

MFUS vs. VOOV - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) at 2.94%. This indicates that MFUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MFUS	VOOV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.10%	2.94%	+1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.84%	7.36%	+1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.22%	9.98%	+1.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.08%	14.44%	+0.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.35%	16.96%	+0.39%

MFUS vs. VOOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFUS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOV's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

MFUS vs. VOOV - Dividend Comparison

MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than VOOV's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF	1.33%	1.54%	1.45%	1.96%	2.07%	1.35%	1.72%	1.89%	1.69%	1.01%	0.00%	0.00%
VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF	1.67%	1.76%	2.10%	1.69%	2.19%	1.87%	2.45%	2.10%	2.65%	2.13%	2.24%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFUS and VOOV in my portfolio?

MFUS and VOOV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MFUS or VOOV?

MFUS has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to VOOV (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFUS dropped -35.21% vs VOOV's -37.31%.

Which ETF is better, MFUS or VOOV?

On 5-year performance, MFUS leads with 13.48% vs 11.39% for VOOV. On fees, VOOV is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VOOV has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MFUS or VOOV?

Over the 5-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 13.48% return vs 11.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MFUS or VOOV?

VOOV is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MFUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MFUS or VOOV?

VOOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.33% for MFUS.

What is the main difference between MFUS and VOOV?

MFUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VOOV is Large Cap Value Equities. MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index​, while VOOV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for MFUS and 0.07% for VOOV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.