MFUS vs. AVLV

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) and AVLV (Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index​, while AVLV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. MFUS is passively managed, while AVLV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MFUS returned 22.30%/yr vs 23.10%/yr for AVLV. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MFUS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AVLV.

Performance

MFUS vs. AVLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFUS achieves a 18.31% return, which is significantly lower than AVLV's 21.82% return.

MFUS

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 3.47%
• YTD: 18.31%
• 6M: 17.50%
• 1Y: 30.42%
• 3Y*: 22.30%
• 5Y*: 13.48%
• 10Y*: —

AVLV

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: 3.04%
• YTD: 21.82%
• 6M: 20.76%
• 1Y: 39.57%
• 3Y*: 23.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFUS vs. AVLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF	18.31%	16.02%	20.17%	12.19%	-5.82%	7.54%
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	21.82%	15.12%	17.49%	17.43%	-5.53%	6.27%

Correlation

The correlation between MFUS and AVLV is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2021	0.93

The correlation between MFUS and AVLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

MFUS vs. AVLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MFUS	AVLV
Technology	24.7%	17.2%
Healthcare	13.4%	5.6%
Industrials	12.2%	15.4%
Financial Services	12.0%	16.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	14.1%
Consumer Defensive	9.7%	7.7%
Energy	6.4%	14.4%
Communication Services	5.1%	6.9%
Basic Materials	2.8%	2.0%
Real Estate	1.7%	0.1%
Utilities	1.6%	0.3%

Return for Risk

MFUS vs. AVLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFUS

MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 87
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 85
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 90

AVLV

AVLV Risk / Return Rank: 93
AVLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
AVLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
AVLV Omega Ratio Rank: 91
AVLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
AVLV Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFUS vs. AVLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MFUS	AVLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.73	3.17	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.86	4.33	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.57	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.79	6.22	-1.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.46	24.66	-5.21

MFUS vs. AVLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the AVLV Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFUS and AVLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MFUS vs. AVLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFUS drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, which is greater than AVLV's maximum drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUS and AVLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFUS	AVLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.21%	-19.50%	-15.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.39%	-6.39%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.39%	-19.50%	+4.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	-0.28%	+0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.98%	-3.90%	-0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.57%	1.61%	-0.04%

Volatility

MFUS vs. AVLV - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) at 3.80%. This indicates that MFUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MFUS	AVLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.10%	3.80%	+0.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.84%	9.35%	-0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.22%	12.57%	-1.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.08%	17.33%	-2.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.35%	17.33%	+0.02%

MFUS vs. AVLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFUS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than AVLV's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

MFUS vs. AVLV - Dividend Comparison

MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than AVLV's 1.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	1.37%	1.33%	1.58%	1.85%	2.00%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF	1.33%	1.54%	1.45%	1.96%	2.07%	1.35%	1.72%	1.89%	1.69%	1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFUS and AVLV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, MFUS and AVLV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MFUS or AVLV?

MFUS has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to AVLV (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFUS dropped -35.21% vs AVLV's -19.50%.

Which ETF is better, MFUS or AVLV?

On 3-year performance, AVLV leads with 23.10% vs 22.30% for MFUS. On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MFUS or AVLV?

Over the 3-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 23.10% return vs 22.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MFUS or AVLV?

AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MFUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MFUS or AVLV?

AVLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 1.33% for MFUS.

What is the main difference between MFUS and AVLV?

MFUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AVLV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for MFUS and 0.15% for AVLV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.