MFMO vs. ILCB
MFMO (Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF) and ILCB (iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFMO is a Momentum fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while ILCB is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. MFMO is actively managed, while ILCB is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MFMO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ILCB.
Performance
MFMO vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFMO achieves a 25.49% return, which is significantly higher than ILCB's 11.12% return.
MFMO
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 11.78%
- YTD
- 25.49%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILCB
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 5.29%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- 1Y
- 28.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.45%
- 10Y*
- 15.00%
MFMO vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFMO Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF | 25.49% | -1.90% |
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 11.12% | 0.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFMO and ILCB is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFMO vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank
MFMO
ILCB
MFMO vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF (MFMO) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFMO | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.24 | 0.64 | +1.61 |
Drawdowns
MFMO vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFMO drawdown since its inception was -12.05%, smaller than the maximum ILCB drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFMO and ILCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFMO | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.05% | -51.53% | +39.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.67% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -6.24% | +3.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.97% | — |
Volatility
MFMO vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFMO | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.50% | 12.02% | +12.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 17.13% | +7.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 18.16% | +6.34% |
MFMO vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFMO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFMO vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison
MFMO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ILCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 0.97% | 1.11% | 1.19% | 1.43% | 1.65% | 1.16% | 1.26% | 2.25% | 2.17% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 2.44% |
MFMO Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFMO and ILCB have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MFMO.
ILCB has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.00% for MFMO.
MFMO is categorized as Momentum, while ILCB is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFMO and 0.03% for ILCB.
Find the right allocation for MFMO and ILCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer