PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFMO vs. MFIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFMO vs. MFIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF (MFMO) and Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFMO achieves a 25.49% return, which is significantly higher than MFIG's 5.69% return.


MFMO

1D
0.71%
1M
11.78%
YTD
25.49%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MFIG

1D
-0.85%
1M
8.02%
YTD
5.69%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFMO vs. MFIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MFMO and MFIG is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025

0.67

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFMO vs. MFIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF (MFMO) and Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MFMO vs. MFIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFMOMFIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.24

0.72

+1.52

Drawdowns

MFMO vs. MFIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFMO drawdown since its inception was -12.05%, smaller than the maximum MFIG drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFMO and MFIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFMOMFIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.05%

-14.29%

+2.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.85%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.42%

-4.65%

+2.23%

Volatility

MFMO vs. MFIG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFMOMFIGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.50%

16.54%

+7.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.50%

16.54%

+7.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.50%

16.54%

+7.96%

MFMO vs. MFIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MFMO and MFIG have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

MFMO vs. MFIG - Dividend Comparison

Neither MFMO nor MFIG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MFMO and MFIG have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MFMO and MFIG have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

MFMO and MFIG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

MFMO is categorized as Momentum, while MFIG is Large Cap Growth Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFMO and MFIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer