MFMO vs. TMFC
MFMO (Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF) and TMFC (Motley Fool 100 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFMO is a Momentum fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while TMFC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool 100 Index. MFMO is actively managed, while TMFC is passively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
MFMO vs. TMFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFMO achieves a 24.12% return, which is significantly higher than TMFC's 4.32% return.
MFMO
- 1D
- -3.40%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 24.12%
- 6M
- 22.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMFC
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- YTD
- 4.32%
- 6M
- 3.34%
- 1Y
- 20.43%
- 3Y*
- 23.57%
- 5Y*
- 14.15%
- 10Y*
- —
MFMO vs. TMFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFMO Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF | 24.12% | -1.80% |
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF | 4.32% | -0.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFMO and TMFC is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFMO vs. TMFC — Risk / Return Rank
MFMO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TMFC
MFMO vs. TMFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF (MFMO) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFMO | TMFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.62 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.87 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFMO vs. TMFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFMO drawdown since its inception was -12.05%, smaller than the maximum TMFC drawdown of -33.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFMO and TMFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFMO | TMFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.05% | -33.06% | +21.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.40% | -4.87% | +1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.41% | -6.75% | +4.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.49% | — |
Volatility
MFMO vs. TMFC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFMO | TMFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.66% | 14.27% | +12.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.66% | 20.48% | +6.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.66% | 22.00% | +4.66% |
MFMO vs. TMFC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MFMO and TMFC have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
MFMO vs. TMFC - Dividend Comparison
MFMO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TMFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFMO Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF | 0.14% | 0.14% | 0.40% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.50% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFMO and TMFC have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFMO and TMFC have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
TMFC has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for MFMO.
MFMO is categorized as Momentum, while TMFC is Large Cap Growth Equities.
Find the right allocation for MFMO and TMFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer