MFMO vs. TMFM
MFMO (Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF) and TMFM (Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFMO is a Momentum fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while TMFM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool. Both are actively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MFMO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TMFM.
Performance
MFMO vs. TMFM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFMO achieves a 25.49% return, which is significantly higher than TMFM's -9.50% return.
MFMO
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 11.78%
- YTD
- 25.49%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMFM
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- -9.50%
- 6M
- -11.03%
- 1Y
- -18.27%
- 3Y*
- 3.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFMO vs. TMFM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFMO Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF | 25.49% | -1.90% |
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -9.50% | -0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFMO and TMFM is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFMO vs. TMFM — Risk / Return Rank
MFMO
TMFM
MFMO vs. TMFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF (MFMO) and Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFMO | TMFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.24 | -0.14 | +2.39 |
Drawdowns
MFMO vs. TMFM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFMO drawdown since its inception was -12.05%, smaller than the maximum TMFM drawdown of -31.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFMO and TMFM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFMO | TMFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.05% | -31.75% | +19.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -27.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -26.35% | +26.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -15.85% | +13.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 14.65% | — |
Volatility
MFMO vs. TMFM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFMO | TMFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.99% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.50% | 18.76% | +5.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 20.63% | +3.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 20.63% | +3.87% |
MFMO vs. TMFM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFMO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TMFM's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFMO vs. TMFM - Dividend Comparison
MFMO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TMFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MFMO Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.06% | 16.27% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFMO and TMFM have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFMO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFMO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFM.
TMFM has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for MFMO.
MFMO is categorized as Momentum, while TMFM is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFMO and 0.85% for TMFM.
Find the right allocation for MFMO and TMFM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer