PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFDX vs. SPDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFDX vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFDX achieves a 9.73% return, which is significantly lower than SPDW's 15.00% return.


MFDX

1D
-0.55%
1M
2.31%
YTD
9.73%
6M
12.33%
1Y
23.13%
3Y*
18.62%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*

SPDW

1D
-0.87%
1M
5.56%
YTD
15.00%
6M
18.06%
1Y
32.15%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
9.38%
10Y*
10.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFDX vs. SPDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFDX
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF
9.73%34.27%4.40%17.54%-10.27%11.07%6.90%19.88%-14.88%7.02%
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
15.00%34.75%3.55%17.81%-15.98%11.45%9.90%22.41%-14.22%6.73%

Correlation

The correlation between MFDX and SPDW is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017

0.97

The correlation between MFDX and SPDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

MFDX vs. SPDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MFDX
SPDW

Industrials

19.9%
19.2%

Financial Services

16.4%
22.9%

Basic Materials

10.8%
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.0%
5.7%

Technology

7.1%
13.7%

Communication Services

7.0%
3.8%

Energy

6.8%
5.5%

Utilities

6.4%
3.3%

Healthcare

6.0%
8.3%

Real Estate

3.0%
2.5%

Industrials

MFDX
19.9%
SPDW
19.2%

Financial Services

MFDX
16.4%
SPDW
22.9%

Basic Materials

MFDX
10.8%
SPDW
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MFDX
8.6%
SPDW
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

MFDX
8.0%
SPDW
5.7%

Technology

MFDX
7.1%
SPDW
13.7%

Communication Services

MFDX
7.0%
SPDW
3.8%

Energy

MFDX
6.8%
SPDW
5.5%

Utilities

MFDX
6.4%
SPDW
3.3%

Healthcare

MFDX
6.0%
SPDW
8.3%

Real Estate

MFDX
3.0%
SPDW
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFDX vs. SPDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFDX
MFDX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
MFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

SPDW
SPDW Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDW Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDW Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFDX vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFDXSPDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.37

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

2.80

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.66

10.93

-2.27

MFDX vs. SPDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the SPDW Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFDX and SPDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFDXSPDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

2.07

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.57

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.24

+0.30

Drawdowns

MFDX vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFDX drawdown since its inception was -36.05%, smaller than the maximum SPDW drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFDX and SPDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFDXSPDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.05%

-60.02%

+23.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

-11.55%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.62%

-13.53%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.58%

-30.21%

+4.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-0.87%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.50%

-12.91%

+6.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.95%

-0.27%

Volatility

MFDX vs. SPDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) is 4.45%, while SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that MFDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFDXSPDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

5.63%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.34%

13.17%

-1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.73%

15.60%

-1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.03%

16.49%

-1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.41%

17.26%

-0.85%

MFDX vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFDX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDW's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFDX vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison

MFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than SPDW's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFDX
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF
2.79%2.97%3.16%3.12%2.85%2.99%1.58%2.88%2.13%0.71%0.00%0.00%
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
2.87%3.30%3.19%2.75%3.12%3.04%1.87%3.13%3.08%1.86%3.11%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, MFDX and SPDW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPDW has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to MFDX (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFDX dropped -36.05% vs SPDW's -60.02%.

On 5-year performance, MFDX leads with 9.92% vs 9.38% for SPDW. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, MFDX has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MFDX has performed better with a 9.92% return vs 9.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MFDX.

SPDW has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 2.79% for MFDX.

MFDX tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index, while SPDW tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MFDX and 0.04% for SPDW.

SPDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFDX and SPDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer