PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFDX vs. MFUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFDX vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFDX achieves a 9.73% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 16.37% return.


MFDX

1D
-0.55%
1M
2.31%
YTD
9.73%
6M
12.33%
1Y
23.13%
3Y*
18.62%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*

MFUS

1D
0.03%
1M
5.72%
YTD
16.37%
6M
16.58%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFDX vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFDX
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF
9.73%34.27%4.40%17.54%-10.27%11.07%6.90%19.88%-14.88%7.02%
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
16.37%16.02%20.17%12.19%-5.82%24.10%10.64%26.17%-7.30%11.20%

Correlation

The correlation between MFDX and MFUS is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017

0.78

The correlation between MFDX and MFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

MFDX vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MFDX
MFUS

Industrials

19.9%
12.6%

Financial Services

16.4%
12.6%

Basic Materials

10.8%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.0%
10.3%

Technology

7.1%
21.8%

Communication Services

7.0%
5.3%

Energy

6.8%
7.0%

Utilities

6.4%
1.7%

Healthcare

6.0%
13.5%

Real Estate

3.0%
1.8%

Industrials

MFDX
19.9%
MFUS
12.6%

Financial Services

MFDX
16.4%
MFUS
12.6%

Basic Materials

MFDX
10.8%
MFUS
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

MFDX
8.6%
MFUS
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

MFDX
8.0%
MFUS
10.3%

Technology

MFDX
7.1%
MFUS
21.8%

Communication Services

MFDX
7.0%
MFUS
5.3%

Energy

MFDX
6.8%
MFUS
7.0%

Utilities

MFDX
6.4%
MFUS
1.7%

Healthcare

MFDX
6.0%
MFUS
13.5%

Real Estate

MFDX
3.0%
MFUS
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFDX vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFDX
MFDX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
MFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

MFUS
MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFDX vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFDXMFUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.47

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

4.41

-2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.66

18.13

-9.47

MFDX vs. MFUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the MFUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFDX and MFUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFDXMFUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

2.63

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.86

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.79

-0.25

Drawdowns

MFDX vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFDX drawdown since its inception was -36.05%, roughly equal to the maximum MFUS drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFDX and MFUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFDXMFUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.05%

-35.21%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

-6.39%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.62%

-15.39%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.58%

-18.22%

-7.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

0.00%

-1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.50%

-4.00%

-2.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

1.55%

+1.13%

Volatility

MFDX vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) at 3.19%. This indicates that MFDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFDXMFUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

3.19%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.34%

8.22%

+3.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.73%

10.72%

+3.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.03%

15.03%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.41%

17.35%

-0.94%

MFDX vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFDX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFDX vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison

MFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than MFUS's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFDX
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF
2.79%2.97%3.16%3.12%2.85%2.99%1.58%2.88%2.13%0.71%
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
1.36%1.54%1.45%1.96%2.07%1.35%1.72%1.89%1.69%1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFDX and MFUS have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFDX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to MFUS (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFDX dropped -36.05% vs MFUS's -35.21%.

On 5-year performance, MFUS leads with 12.82% vs 9.92% for MFDX. On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, MFUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 9.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MFDX.

MFDX has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 1.36% for MFUS.

MFDX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while MFUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. MFDX tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index​. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MFDX and 0.30% for MFUS.

MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFDX and MFUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer