MFDX vs. MFUS
MFDX (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF) and MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFDX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index, while MFUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MFDX returned 9.92%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for MFUS. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFDX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MFUS.
Performance
MFDX vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFDX achieves a 9.73% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 16.37% return.
MFDX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- 9.73%
- 6M
- 12.33%
- 1Y
- 23.13%
- 3Y*
- 18.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- —
MFUS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 16.37%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.25%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- —
MFDX vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF | 9.73% | 34.27% | 4.40% | 17.54% | -10.27% | 11.07% | 6.90% | 19.88% | -14.88% | 7.02% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 16.37% | 16.02% | 20.17% | 12.19% | -5.82% | 24.10% | 10.64% | 26.17% | -7.30% | 11.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFDX and MFUS is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017 | 0.78 |
The correlation between MFDX and MFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
MFDX vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MFDX
MFUS
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
Industrials
MFDX
MFUS
Financial Services
MFDX
MFUS
Basic Materials
MFDX
MFUS
Consumer Cyclical
MFDX
MFUS
Consumer Defensive
MFDX
MFUS
Technology
MFDX
MFUS
Communication Services
MFDX
MFUS
Energy
MFDX
MFUS
Utilities
MFDX
MFUS
Healthcare
MFDX
MFUS
Real Estate
MFDX
MFUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFDX vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank
MFDX
MFUS
MFDX vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFDX | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.47 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 4.41 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.66 | 18.13 | -9.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFDX | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 2.63 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.86 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.79 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
MFDX vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFDX drawdown since its inception was -36.05%, roughly equal to the maximum MFUS drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFDX and MFUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFDX | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.05% | -35.21% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.66% | -6.39% | -4.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.62% | -15.39% | +3.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.58% | -18.22% | -7.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | 0.00% | -1.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -4.00% | -2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 1.55% | +1.13% |
Volatility
MFDX vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) at 3.19%. This indicates that MFDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFDX | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 3.19% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.34% | 8.22% | +3.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.73% | 10.72% | +3.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 15.03% | 0.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.41% | 17.35% | -0.94% |
MFDX vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFDX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFDX vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison
MFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than MFUS's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF | 2.79% | 2.97% | 3.16% | 3.12% | 2.85% | 2.99% | 1.58% | 2.88% | 2.13% | 0.71% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.36% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFDX and MFUS have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFDX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to MFUS (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFDX dropped -36.05% vs MFUS's -35.21%.
On 5-year performance, MFUS leads with 12.82% vs 9.92% for MFDX. On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, MFUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 9.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MFDX.
MFDX has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 1.36% for MFUS.
MFDX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while MFUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. MFDX tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MFDX and 0.30% for MFUS.
MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFDX and MFUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer