MFDX vs. IPOS
MFDX (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF) and IPOS (Renaissance International IPO ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - MFDX tracks the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index while IPOS tracks the Renaissance International IPO Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MFDX returned 9.92%/yr vs -7.69%/yr for IPOS. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFDX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for IPOS.
Performance
MFDX vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFDX achieves a 9.73% return, which is significantly lower than IPOS's 40.15% return.
MFDX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- 9.73%
- 6M
- 12.33%
- 1Y
- 23.13%
- 3Y*
- 18.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- —
IPOS
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 10.58%
- YTD
- 40.15%
- 6M
- 44.26%
- 1Y
- 65.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.28%
- 5Y*
- -7.69%
- 10Y*
- 3.00%
MFDX vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF | 9.73% | 34.27% | 4.40% | 17.54% | -10.27% | 11.07% | 6.90% | 19.88% | -14.88% | 7.02% |
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 40.15% | 39.93% | -12.34% | -16.49% | -33.46% | -30.62% | 50.71% | 30.93% | -22.33% | 12.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFDX and IPOS is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017 | 0.58 |
The correlation between MFDX and IPOS shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MFDX vs. IPOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MFDX
IPOS
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Industrials
MFDX
IPOS
Financial Services
MFDX
IPOS
Basic Materials
MFDX
IPOS
Consumer Cyclical
MFDX
IPOS
Consumer Defensive
MFDX
IPOS
Technology
MFDX
IPOS
Communication Services
MFDX
IPOS
Energy
MFDX
IPOS
Utilities
MFDX
IPOS
Healthcare
MFDX
IPOS
Real Estate
MFDX
IPOS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFDX vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank
MFDX
IPOS
MFDX vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFDX | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.41 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 3.83 | -1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.66 | 11.58 | -2.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFDX | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 2.24 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | -0.28 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.09 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
MFDX vs. IPOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFDX drawdown since its inception was -36.05%, smaller than the maximum IPOS drawdown of -73.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFDX and IPOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFDX | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.05% | -73.09% | +37.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.66% | -17.17% | +6.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.62% | -34.08% | +22.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.58% | -69.93% | +44.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -40.44% | +38.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -31.99% | +25.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 5.67% | -2.99% |
Volatility
MFDX vs. IPOS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) is 4.45%, while Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a volatility of 12.05%. This indicates that MFDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFDX | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 12.05% | -7.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.34% | 26.45% | -15.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.73% | 29.41% | -15.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 27.19% | -12.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.41% | 24.13% | -7.72% |
MFDX vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFDX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than IPOS's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFDX vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison
MFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than IPOS's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 0.68% | 1.04% | 0.93% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.89% | 1.12% | 0.87% | 1.73% | 1.08% |
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF | 2.79% | 2.97% | 3.16% | 3.12% | 2.85% | 2.99% | 1.58% | 2.88% | 2.13% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFDX and IPOS have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IPOS has higher volatility (12.05%) compared to MFDX (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFDX dropped -36.05% vs IPOS's -73.09%.
On 5-year performance, MFDX leads with 9.92% vs -7.69% for IPOS. On fees, MFDX is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, MFDX has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MFDX has performed better with a 9.92% return vs -7.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MFDX is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.
MFDX has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 0.68% for IPOS.
MFDX tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index, while IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Renaissance Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MFDX and 0.80% for IPOS.
IPOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFDX and IPOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer