PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFDX vs. IPOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFDX vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFDX achieves a 9.73% return, which is significantly lower than IPOS's 40.15% return.


MFDX

1D
-0.55%
1M
2.31%
YTD
9.73%
6M
12.33%
1Y
23.13%
3Y*
18.62%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*

IPOS

1D
0.43%
1M
10.58%
YTD
40.15%
6M
44.26%
1Y
65.50%
3Y*
15.28%
5Y*
-7.69%
10Y*
3.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFDX vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFDX
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF
9.73%34.27%4.40%17.54%-10.27%11.07%6.90%19.88%-14.88%7.02%
IPOS
Renaissance International IPO ETF
40.15%39.93%-12.34%-16.49%-33.46%-30.62%50.71%30.93%-22.33%12.63%

Correlation

The correlation between MFDX and IPOS is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017

0.58

The correlation between MFDX and IPOS shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MFDX vs. IPOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MFDX
IPOS

Industrials

19.9%
15.0%

Financial Services

16.4%
9.6%

Basic Materials

10.8%
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

8.0%
4.7%

Technology

7.1%
42.0%

Communication Services

7.0%
0.3%

Energy

6.8%
4.9%

Utilities

6.4%
3.1%

Healthcare

6.0%
16.2%

Real Estate

3.0%

-

Industrials

MFDX
19.9%
IPOS
15.0%

Financial Services

MFDX
16.4%
IPOS
9.6%

Basic Materials

MFDX
10.8%
IPOS
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MFDX
8.6%
IPOS
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

MFDX
8.0%
IPOS
4.7%

Technology

MFDX
7.1%
IPOS
42.0%

Communication Services

MFDX
7.0%
IPOS
0.3%

Energy

MFDX
6.8%
IPOS
4.9%

Utilities

MFDX
6.4%
IPOS
3.1%

Healthcare

MFDX
6.0%
IPOS
16.2%

Real Estate

MFDX
3.0%
IPOS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFDX vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFDX
MFDX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
MFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

IPOS
IPOS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IPOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPOS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IPOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPOS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFDX vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFDXIPOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.41

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

3.83

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.66

11.58

-2.92

MFDX vs. IPOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the IPOS Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFDX and IPOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFDXIPOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

2.24

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

-0.28

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.09

+0.45

Drawdowns

MFDX vs. IPOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFDX drawdown since its inception was -36.05%, smaller than the maximum IPOS drawdown of -73.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFDX and IPOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFDXIPOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.05%

-73.09%

+37.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

-17.17%

+6.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.62%

-34.08%

+22.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.58%

-69.93%

+44.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-40.44%

+38.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.50%

-31.99%

+25.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

5.67%

-2.99%

Volatility

MFDX vs. IPOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) is 4.45%, while Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a volatility of 12.05%. This indicates that MFDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFDXIPOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

12.05%

-7.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.34%

26.45%

-15.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.73%

29.41%

-15.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.03%

27.19%

-12.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.41%

24.13%

-7.72%

MFDX vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFDX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than IPOS's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFDX vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison

MFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than IPOS's 0.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPOS
Renaissance International IPO ETF
0.68%1.04%0.93%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.25%0.89%1.12%0.87%1.73%1.08%
MFDX
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF
2.79%2.97%3.16%3.12%2.85%2.99%1.58%2.88%2.13%0.71%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFDX and IPOS have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IPOS has higher volatility (12.05%) compared to MFDX (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFDX dropped -36.05% vs IPOS's -73.09%.

On 5-year performance, MFDX leads with 9.92% vs -7.69% for IPOS. On fees, MFDX is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, MFDX has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MFDX has performed better with a 9.92% return vs -7.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MFDX is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.

MFDX has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 0.68% for IPOS.

MFDX tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index, while IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Renaissance Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MFDX and 0.80% for IPOS.

IPOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFDX and IPOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer