IPOS vs. SPY
IPOS (Renaissance International IPO ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IPOS is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Renaissance International IPO Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IPOS returned 4.56%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for SPY. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IPOS charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
IPOS vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPOS achieves a 55.22% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 9.74% return. Over the past 10 years, IPOS has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 4.56%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.70% annualized return.
IPOS
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 21.21%
- YTD
- 55.22%
- 6M
- 53.61%
- 1Y
- 87.31%
- 3Y*
- 21.89%
- 5Y*
- -5.55%
- 10Y*
- 4.56%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 26.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
IPOS vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 55.22% | 39.93% | -12.34% | -16.49% | -33.46% | -30.62% | 50.71% | 30.93% | -22.33% | 36.83% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9.74% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between IPOS and SPY is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2014 | 0.45 |
The correlation between IPOS and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
IPOS vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IPOS
SPY
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
IPOS
SPY
Healthcare
IPOS
SPY
Industrials
IPOS
SPY
Financial Services
IPOS
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
IPOS
SPY
Energy
IPOS
SPY
Consumer Defensive
IPOS
SPY
Basic Materials
IPOS
SPY
Utilities
IPOS
SPY
Communication Services
IPOS
SPY
Real Estate
IPOS
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPOS vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
IPOS
SPY
IPOS vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IPOS | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.39 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.11 | 3.01 | +2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.32 | 13.54 | +1.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IPOS vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPOS drawdown since its inception was -73.09%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPOS and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPOS | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.09% | -55.19% | -17.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.17% | -8.88% | -8.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.08% | -18.76% | -15.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.93% | -24.50% | -45.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.09% | -33.72% | -39.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.04% | -1.75% | -32.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.01% | -9.04% | -22.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.72% | 1.97% | +3.75% |
Volatility
IPOS vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a higher volatility of 14.82% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 4.64%. This indicates that IPOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPOS | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.82% | 4.64% | +10.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.53% | 9.75% | +19.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.20% | 12.43% | +19.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.87% | 17.14% | +10.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.42% | 17.99% | +6.43% |
IPOS vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPOS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
IPOS vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
IPOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 0.30% | 1.04% | 0.93% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.89% | 1.12% | 0.87% | 1.73% | 1.08% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IPOS and SPY have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IPOS has higher volatility (14.82%) compared to SPY (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPOS dropped -73.09% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.70% vs 4.56% for IPOS. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 4.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.30% for IPOS.
IPOS is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Renaissance Capital and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for IPOS and 0.09% for SPY.
IPOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IPOS and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer