PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPOS vs. PIZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPOS vs. PIZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) and Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPOS achieves a 32.73% return, which is significantly higher than PIZ's 6.37% return. Over the past 10 years, IPOS has underperformed PIZ with an annualized return of 2.37%, while PIZ has yielded a comparatively higher 9.89% annualized return.


IPOS

1D
0.99%
1M
-8.90%
6M
16.48%
YTD
32.73%
1Y
48.11%
3Y*
12.33%
5Y*
-7.18%
10Y*
2.37%
ALL TIME*
1.63%

PIZ

1D
0.73%
1M
-5.75%
6M
0.11%
YTD
6.37%
1Y
16.10%
3Y*
19.82%
5Y*
7.40%
10Y*
9.89%
ALL TIME*
5.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$55.92K$63.26K$109.96K
$5.29M$4.32M$4.45M

IPOS vs. PIZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IPOS
Renaissance International IPO ETF
32.73%39.93%-12.34%-16.49%-33.46%-30.62%50.71%30.93%-22.33%36.83%
PIZ
Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF
6.37%37.22%16.30%17.96%-30.48%20.53%17.96%27.51%-16.15%30.96%

Correlation

The correlation between IPOS and PIZ is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2014

0.53

The correlation between IPOS and PIZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IPOS vs. PIZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IPOS
PIZ

Technology

46.6%
15.7%

Healthcare

17.7%
0.7%

Industrials

14.5%
46.9%

Financial Services

7.5%
27.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
1.9%

Energy

4.9%
1.5%

Basic Materials

4.4%
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

3.4%
1.7%

Utilities

3.1%
1.4%

Communication Services

0.3%

-

Real Estate

-

0.4%

Technology

IPOS
46.6%
PIZ
15.7%

Healthcare

IPOS
17.7%
PIZ
0.7%

Industrials

IPOS
14.5%
PIZ
46.9%

Financial Services

IPOS
7.5%
PIZ
27.8%

Consumer Defensive

IPOS
6.1%
PIZ
1.9%

Energy

IPOS
4.9%
PIZ
1.5%

Basic Materials

IPOS
4.4%
PIZ
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IPOS
3.4%
PIZ
1.7%

Utilities

IPOS
3.1%
PIZ
1.4%

Communication Services

IPOS
0.3%
PIZ

-

Real Estate

IPOS

-

PIZ
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPOS vs. PIZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IPOS
IPOS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IPOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPOS Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IPOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPOS Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

PIZ
PIZ Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PIZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PIZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IPOS vs. PIZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) and Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IPOSPIZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.13

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

0.94

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.14

2.96

+4.18

IPOS vs. PIZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPOS Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the PIZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPOS and PIZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IPOS vs. PIZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPOS drawdown since its inception was -73.09%, which is greater than PIZ's maximum drawdown of -60.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPOS and PIZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPOSPIZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.09%

-60.61%

-12.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.27%

-15.97%

-2.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.44%

-15.97%

-15.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.41%

-40.93%

-26.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.09%

-40.93%

-32.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.60%

-12.40%

-31.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.09%

-14.86%

-17.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.63%

5.08%

+1.55%

Volatility

IPOS vs. PIZ - Volatility Comparison

Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a higher volatility of 10.88% compared to Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) at 8.00%. This indicates that IPOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPOSPIZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.88%

8.00%

+2.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.55%

21.61%

+9.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.20%

23.65%

+10.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.15%

20.62%

+7.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.60%

19.70%

+4.90%

IPOS vs. PIZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IPOS and PIZ have an expense ratio of 0.80%.


Dividends

IPOS vs. PIZ - Dividend Comparison

IPOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than PIZ's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPOS
Renaissance International IPO ETF
0.35%1.04%0.93%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.25%0.89%1.12%0.87%1.73%1.08%
PIZ
Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF
1.61%1.55%1.68%1.86%2.04%1.01%0.37%1.58%1.06%1.30%2.21%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


IPOS and PIZ have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IPOS has higher volatility (10.88%) compared to PIZ (8.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPOS dropped -73.09% vs PIZ's -60.61%.

On 10-year performance, PIZ leads with 9.89% vs 2.37% for IPOS. Both ETFs have the same 0.80% expense ratio. On volatility, PIZ has been the lower-risk option at 8.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PIZ has performed better with a 9.89% return vs 2.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IPOS and PIZ have the same expense ratio: 0.80% per year.

PIZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.35% for IPOS.

IPOS is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while PIZ is Momentum. IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index, while PIZ tracks Dorsey Wright Developed Markets Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Renaissance Capital and Invesco.

IPOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPOS and PIZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer