IPOS vs. IPO
IPOS (Renaissance International IPO ETF) and IPO (Renaissance IPO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IPOS is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Renaissance International IPO Index, while IPO is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Renaissance IPO Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IPOS returned 4.56%/yr vs 12.40%/yr for IPO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IPOS charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for IPO.
Performance
IPOS vs. IPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPOS achieves a 55.22% return, which is significantly higher than IPO's 29.28% return. Over the past 10 years, IPOS has underperformed IPO with an annualized return of 4.56%, while IPO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.40% annualized return.
IPOS
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 21.21%
- YTD
- 55.22%
- 6M
- 53.61%
- 1Y
- 87.31%
- 3Y*
- 21.89%
- 5Y*
- -5.55%
- 10Y*
- 4.56%
IPO
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 11.14%
- YTD
- 29.28%
- 6M
- 23.90%
- 1Y
- 36.21%
- 3Y*
- 24.13%
- 5Y*
- -1.92%
- 10Y*
- 12.40%
IPOS vs. IPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 55.22% | 39.93% | -12.34% | -16.49% | -33.46% | -30.62% | 50.71% | 30.93% | -22.33% | 36.83% |
IPO Renaissance IPO ETF | 29.28% | 5.45% | 15.68% | 52.55% | -57.26% | -10.31% | 107.88% | 34.11% | -17.24% | 37.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between IPOS and IPO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2014 | 0.45 |
The correlation between IPOS and IPO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
IPOS vs. IPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IPOS
IPO
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
IPOS
IPO
Healthcare
IPOS
IPO
Industrials
IPOS
IPO
Financial Services
IPOS
IPO
Consumer Cyclical
IPOS
IPO
Energy
IPOS
IPO
Consumer Defensive
IPOS
IPO
Basic Materials
IPOS
IPO
-
Utilities
IPOS
IPO
Communication Services
IPOS
IPO
Real Estate
IPOS
-
IPO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPOS vs. IPO — Risk / Return Rank
IPOS
IPO
IPOS vs. IPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) and Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IPOS | IPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.21 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.11 | 1.39 | +3.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.32 | 3.10 | +12.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IPOS vs. IPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPOS drawdown since its inception was -73.09%, which is greater than IPO's maximum drawdown of -68.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPOS and IPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPOS | IPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.09% | -68.76% | -4.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.17% | -26.24% | +9.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.08% | -32.04% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.93% | -66.02% | -3.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.09% | -68.76% | -4.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.04% | -21.89% | -12.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.01% | -22.93% | -9.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.72% | 11.72% | -6.00% |
Volatility
IPOS vs. IPO - Volatility Comparison
Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a higher volatility of 14.82% compared to Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) at 10.97%. This indicates that IPOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPOS | IPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.82% | 10.97% | +3.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.53% | 23.55% | +5.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.20% | 30.18% | +2.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.87% | 36.06% | -8.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.42% | 31.62% | -7.20% |
IPOS vs. IPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPOS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than IPO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IPOS vs. IPO - Dividend Comparison
IPOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than IPO's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPO Renaissance IPO ETF | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.26% | 0.49% | 0.43% | 0.40% | 0.11% |
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 0.30% | 1.04% | 0.93% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.89% | 1.12% | 0.87% | 1.73% | 1.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IPOS and IPO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IPOS has higher volatility (14.82%) compared to IPO (10.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPOS dropped -73.09% vs IPO's -68.76%.
On 10-year performance, IPO leads with 12.40% vs 4.56% for IPOS. On fees, IPO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, IPO has been the lower-risk option at 10.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IPO has performed better with a 12.40% return vs 4.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IPO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.
IPO has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.30% for IPOS.
IPOS is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IPO is Mid Cap Growth Equities. IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index, while IPO tracks Renaissance IPO Index. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for IPOS and 0.60% for IPO.
IPOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IPOS and IPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer