PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
METV vs. IRBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

METV vs. IRBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF (IRBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METV achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly lower than IRBO's 66.09% return.


METV

1D
-1.29%
1M
5.65%
YTD
1.54%
6M
-2.08%
1Y
20.08%
3Y*
23.94%
5Y*
10Y*

IRBO

1D
-0.90%
1M
26.10%
YTD
66.09%
6M
63.47%
1Y
112.42%
3Y*
36.54%
5Y*
14.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METV vs. IRBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
METV
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF
1.54%30.83%24.93%60.57%-52.66%0.40%
IRBO
iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF
66.09%29.97%8.02%36.37%-37.89%-5.83%

Correlation

The correlation between METV and IRBO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.87

The correlation between METV and IRBO shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

METV vs. IRBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
METV
IRBO

Technology

50.4%
83.8%

Communication Services

38.1%
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
2.9%

Financial Services

3.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Industrials

-

4.7%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Utilities

-

3.2%

Technology

METV
50.4%
IRBO
83.8%

Communication Services

METV
38.1%
IRBO
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

METV
8.2%
IRBO
2.9%

Financial Services

METV
3.3%
IRBO

-

Basic Materials

METV

-

IRBO

-

Consumer Defensive

METV

-

IRBO
0.0%

Energy

METV

-

IRBO

-

Healthcare

METV

-

IRBO
0.0%

Industrials

METV

-

IRBO
4.7%

Real Estate

METV

-

IRBO
1.2%

Utilities

METV

-

IRBO
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

METV vs. IRBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METV
METV Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
METV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
METV Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
METV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
METV Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

IRBO
IRBO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
IRBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRBO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
IRBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRBO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METV vs. IRBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF (IRBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


METVIRBODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.84

3.78

-2.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.26

4.13

-2.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.55

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

6.01

-5.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.64

20.88

-19.24

METV vs. IRBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METV Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the IRBO Sharpe Ratio of 3.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METV and IRBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


METVIRBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

3.78

-2.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.63

-0.47

Drawdowns

METV vs. IRBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METV drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, which is greater than IRBO's maximum drawdown of -54.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METV and IRBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


METVIRBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.64%

-54.50%

-5.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.27%

-18.81%

-9.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.27%

-32.44%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.18%

-0.90%

-9.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.00%

-19.85%

-6.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.29%

5.40%

+6.89%

Volatility

METV vs. IRBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) is 5.70%, while iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF (IRBO) has a volatility of 12.01%. This indicates that METV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IRBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


METVIRBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.70%

12.01%

-6.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.67%

25.12%

-7.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.88%

29.94%

-6.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.96%

28.58%

+1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.96%

27.75%

+2.21%

METV vs. IRBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

METV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IRBO's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

METV vs. IRBO - Dividend Comparison

METV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, while IRBO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IRBO
iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF
0.00%0.00%0.50%0.88%0.75%2.41%0.53%0.69%0.34%
METV
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF
0.18%0.18%0.00%0.17%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


METV and IRBO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IRBO has higher volatility (12.01%) compared to METV (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METV dropped -59.64% vs IRBO's -54.50%.

On 3-year performance, IRBO leads with 36.54% vs 23.94% for METV. On fees, IRBO is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, METV has been the lower-risk option at 5.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IRBO has performed better with a 36.54% return vs 23.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IRBO is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for METV.

METV has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.00% for IRBO.

METV is categorized as Technology Equities, while IRBO is Robotics. METV tracks Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net, while IRBO tracks NYSE FactSet Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for METV and 0.47% for IRBO.

IRBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for METV and IRBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer