METV vs. IRBO
METV (Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF) and IRBO (iShares Future AI & Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net, while IRBO is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the Morningstar Global Artificial Intelligence Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, METV returned 4.64%/yr vs 9.92%/yr for IRBO. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. METV charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IRBO.
Performance
METV vs. IRBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METV achieves a -2.77% return, which is significantly lower than IRBO's 38.42% return.
METV
- 1D
- -2.92%
- 1M
- -2.51%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- -2.77%
- 1Y
- 3.23%
- 3Y*
- 19.08%
- 5Y*
- 4.64%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.92%
IRBO
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -6.25%
- 6M
- 29.47%
- YTD
- 38.42%
- 1Y
- 57.81%
- 3Y*
- 25.12%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $36.04M | $40.00M | $59.74M | |
| $748.35K | $896.30K | $954.56K |
METV vs. IRBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF | -2.77% | 30.83% | 24.93% | 60.57% | -52.66% | 0.66% |
IRBO iShares Future AI & Tech ETF | 38.42% | 29.97% | 8.02% | 36.37% | -37.89% | -6.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between METV and IRBO is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021 | 0.86 |
The correlation between METV and IRBO shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
METV vs. IRBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
METV
IRBO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
METV
IRBO
Communication Services
METV
IRBO
Consumer Cyclical
METV
IRBO
Financial Services
METV
IRBO
-
Basic Materials
METV
-
IRBO
-
Consumer Defensive
METV
-
IRBO
Energy
METV
-
IRBO
-
Healthcare
METV
-
IRBO
Industrials
METV
-
IRBO
Real Estate
METV
-
IRBO
Utilities
METV
-
IRBO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METV vs. IRBO — Risk / Return Rank
METV
IRBO
METV vs. IRBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (IRBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| METV | IRBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.25 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 2.24 | -2.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.09 | 7.25 | -7.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
METV vs. IRBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METV drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, which is greater than IRBO's maximum drawdown of -54.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METV and IRBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METV | IRBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.64% | -54.50% | -5.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.27% | -24.00% | -4.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.27% | -32.44% | +4.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.64% | -50.53% | -9.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.00% | -17.41% | +3.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.57% | -19.68% | -5.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.34% | 7.42% | +5.92% |
Volatility
METV vs. IRBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) is 6.13%, while iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (IRBO) has a volatility of 14.17%. This indicates that METV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IRBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METV | IRBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.13% | 14.17% | -8.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.71% | 33.16% | -13.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.60% | 37.34% | -11.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.07% | 30.29% | -0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.89% | 28.64% | +1.25% |
METV vs. IRBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
METV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IRBO's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
METV vs. IRBO - Dividend Comparison
METV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, more than IRBO's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRBO iShares Future AI & Tech ETF | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.50% | 0.88% | 0.75% | 2.41% | 0.53% | 0.69% | 0.34% |
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF | 0.18% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METV and IRBO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IRBO has higher volatility (14.17%) compared to METV (6.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METV dropped -59.64% vs IRBO's -54.50%.
On 5-year performance, IRBO leads with 9.92% vs 4.64% for METV. On fees, IRBO is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, METV has been the lower-risk option at 6.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IRBO has performed better with a 9.92% return vs 4.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IRBO is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for METV.
METV has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.07% for IRBO.
METV is categorized as Technology Equities, while IRBO is Artificial Intelligence. METV tracks Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net, while IRBO tracks Morningstar Global Artificial Intelligence Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for METV and 0.47% for IRBO.
IRBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for METV and IRBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer