METV vs. DRAM

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

METV (Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF) and DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from Roundhill. METV is passively managed, while DRAM is actively managed. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. METV charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRAM.

Performance

METV vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

METV

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: 1.46%
• 6M: 9.40%
• YTD: 1.19%
• 1Y: 4.54%
• 3Y*: 22.55%
• 5Y*: 5.32%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.73%

DRAM

• 1D: 7.35%
• 1M: -9.47%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	$4.17B	$4.40B	$3.59B
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF	$763.15K	$886.46K	$952.24K

METV vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF	17.88%
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	103.30%

Correlation

The correlation between METV and DRAM is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026	0.50

METV vs. DRAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	METV	DRAM
Technology	54.1%	100.0%
Communication Services	17.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	-
Financial Services	3.1%	-2.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

METV vs. DRAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

METV

METV Risk / Return Rank: 13
METV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
METV Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
METV Omega Ratio Rank: 14
METV Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
METV Martin Ratio Rank: 13

DRAM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

METV vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	METV	DRAM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.18	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.42	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.16	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.34	—	—

Drawdowns

METV vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METV drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, which is greater than DRAM's maximum drawdown of -44.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METV and DRAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	METV	DRAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.64%	-44.44%	-15.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.50%	-32.00%	+21.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.55%	-11.06%	-14.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.37%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	METV	DRAM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.49%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.50%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.39%	100.36%	-74.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.11%	100.36%	-70.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.89%	100.36%	-70.47%

METV vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

METV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

METV vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison

METV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, while DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF	0.18%	0.18%	0.00%	0.17%	0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METV and DRAM in my portfolio?

METV and DRAM have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, METV or DRAM?

On fees, DRAM is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, METV or DRAM?

DRAM is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for METV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METV or DRAM?

METV has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.

What is the main difference between METV and DRAM?

Their fees differ too: 0.75% for METV and 0.65% for DRAM.