DRAM vs. EWY
DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) and EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRAM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while EWY is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index. DRAM is actively managed, while EWY is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DRAM charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EWY.
Performance
DRAM vs. EWY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DRAM
- 1D
- -3.76%
- 1M
- -16.92%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
EWY
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- -12.79%
- 6M
- 28.34%
- YTD
- 61.59%
- 1Y
- 127.36%
- 3Y*
- 35.68%
- 5Y*
- 14.47%
- 10Y*
- 13.13%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.23B | $4.59B | $3.52B | |
| $4.45B | $4.55B | $4.16B |
DRAM vs. EWY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 86.56% |
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 24.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRAM and EWY is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.94 |
DRAM vs. EWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRAM
EWY
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
Technology
DRAM
EWY
Basic Materials
DRAM
-
EWY
Communication Services
DRAM
-
EWY
Consumer Cyclical
DRAM
-
EWY
Consumer Defensive
DRAM
-
EWY
Energy
DRAM
-
EWY
Healthcare
DRAM
-
EWY
Industrials
DRAM
-
EWY
Real Estate
DRAM
-
EWY
-
Utilities
DRAM
-
EWY
Financial Services
DRAM
EWY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRAM vs. EWY — Risk / Return Rank
DRAM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EWY
DRAM vs. EWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRAM | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.55 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRAM vs. EWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRAM drawdown since its inception was -44.44%, smaller than the maximum EWY drawdown of -74.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAM and EWY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRAM | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.44% | -74.14% | +29.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -34.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.60% | -28.33% | -9.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.50% | -20.10% | +9.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.56% | — |
Volatility
DRAM vs. EWY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRAM | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 22.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 50.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 100.96% | 54.29% | +46.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 100.96% | 32.77% | +68.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 100.96% | 29.38% | +71.58% |
DRAM vs. EWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRAM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EWY's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRAM vs. EWY - Dividend Comparison
DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.30% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, DRAM and EWY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EWY is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EWY is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRAM.
EWY has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.
DRAM is categorized as Technology Equities, while EWY is South Korea Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DRAM and 0.59% for EWY.
Find the right allocation for DRAM and EWY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer