DRAM vs. MU
DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
DRAM vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DRAM
- 1D
- 5.23%
- 1M
- 52.82%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MU
- 1D
- 6.82%
- 1M
- 61.30%
- YTD
- 324.61%
- 6M
- 338.33%
- 1Y
- 882.43%
- 3Y*
- 165.88%
- 5Y*
- 73.49%
- 10Y*
- 57.52%
DRAM vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 198.96% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 229.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRAM and MU is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRAM vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
DRAM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MU
DRAM vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRAM | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.82 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 29.44 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 111.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRAM vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRAM drawdown since its inception was -19.97%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAM and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRAM | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.97% | -98.25% | +78.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -30.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -57.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -57.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.89% | -58.13% | +55.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.97% | — |
Volatility
DRAM vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRAM | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 33.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 58.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.28% | 71.47% | +15.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 87.28% | 53.67% | +33.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.28% | 50.30% | +36.98% |
Dividends
DRAM vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.04% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, DRAM and MU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for DRAM and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer