METV vs. BLOK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

METV (Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF) and BLOK (Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. METV is passively managed, while BLOK is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, METV returned 23.94%/yr vs 51.34%/yr for BLOK. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. METV charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for BLOK.

Performance

METV vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METV achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly lower than BLOK's 16.21% return.

METV

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: 5.65%
• YTD: 1.54%
• 6M: -2.08%
• 1Y: 20.08%
• 3Y*: 23.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLOK

• 1D: -2.62%
• 1M: 7.72%
• YTD: 16.21%
• 6M: 7.24%
• 1Y: 30.79%
• 3Y*: 51.34%
• 5Y*: 11.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METV vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF	1.54%	30.83%	24.93%	60.57%	-52.66%	0.40%
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF	16.21%	32.64%	53.12%	99.62%	-62.36%	-4.05%

Correlation

The correlation between METV and BLOK is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021	0.79

The correlation between METV and BLOK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

METV vs. BLOK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	METV	BLOK
Technology	50.4%	31.8%
Communication Services	38.1%	5.2%
Consumer Cyclical	8.2%	6.7%
Financial Services	3.3%	55.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	1.0%
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

METV vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METV

METV Risk / Return Rank: 21
METV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
METV Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
METV Omega Ratio Rank: 23
METV Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
METV Martin Ratio Rank: 17

BLOK

BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 21
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 23
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METV vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	METV	BLOK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	0.81	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	1.30	-0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.16	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.71	0.87	-0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.64	1.90	-0.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

METV vs. BLOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METV Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the BLOK Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METV and BLOK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	METV	BLOK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84	0.81	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.48	-0.32

Drawdowns

METV vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METV drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, smaller than the maximum BLOK drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METV and BLOK.

Drawdown Indicators

	METV	BLOK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.64%	-73.33%	+13.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.27%	-35.64%	+7.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.27%	-35.64%	+7.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-73.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.18%	-10.16%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.00%	-26.08%	+0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.29%	16.23%	-3.94%

Volatility

METV vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) is 5.70%, while Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) has a volatility of 10.59%. This indicates that METV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	METV	BLOK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.70%	10.59%	-4.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.67%	28.55%	-10.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.88%	38.29%	-14.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.96%	42.36%	-12.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.96%	38.97%	-9.01%

METV vs. BLOK - Expense Ratio Comparison

METV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BLOK's 0.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

METV vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison

METV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than BLOK's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF	0.62%	0.72%	6.00%	1.15%	0.00%	14.31%	1.88%	2.05%	1.30%
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF	0.18%	0.18%	0.00%	0.17%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METV and BLOK in my portfolio?

METV and BLOK have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, METV or BLOK?

BLOK has higher volatility (10.59%) compared to METV (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METV dropped -59.64% vs BLOK's -73.33%.

Which ETF is better, METV or BLOK?

On 3-year performance, BLOK leads with 51.34% vs 23.94% for METV. On fees, BLOK is cheaper at 0.71% per year. On volatility, METV has been the lower-risk option at 5.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, METV or BLOK?

Over the 3-year period, BLOK has performed better with a 51.34% return vs 23.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, METV or BLOK?

BLOK is cheaper with a 0.71% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for METV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METV or BLOK?

BLOK has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.18% for METV.

What is the main difference between METV and BLOK?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for METV and 0.71% for BLOK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

METV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.