BLOK vs. DAPP

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BLOK (Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF) and DAPP (VanEck Digital Transformation ETF) are both Blockchain funds. BLOK is actively managed, while DAPP is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BLOK returned 12.71%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for DAPP. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BLOK charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for DAPP.

Performance

BLOK vs. DAPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) and VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLOK achieves a 16.89% return, which is significantly lower than DAPP's 32.37% return.

BLOK

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 4.04%
• YTD: 16.89%
• 6M: 11.37%
• 1Y: 28.48%
• 3Y*: 49.16%
• 5Y*: 12.71%
• 10Y*: —

DAPP

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: 2.87%
• YTD: 32.37%
• 6M: 20.82%
• 1Y: 43.38%
• 3Y*: 51.74%
• 5Y*: 0.56%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLOK vs. DAPP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF	16.89%	32.64%	53.12%	99.62%	-62.36%	-23.56%
DAPP VanEck Digital Transformation ETF	32.37%	15.03%	44.87%	285.02%	-85.60%	-45.88%

Correlation

The correlation between BLOK and DAPP is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2021	0.96

The correlation between BLOK and DAPP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

BLOK vs. DAPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BLOK	DAPP
Financial Services	60.4%	62.8%
Technology	28.3%	34.7%
Consumer Cyclical	6.2%	2.5%
Communication Services	3.1%	-
Industrials	1.0%	-
Real Estate	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BLOK vs. DAPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLOK

BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 20
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 21
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 17

DAPP

DAPP Risk / Return Rank: 21
DAPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
DAPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
DAPP Omega Ratio Rank: 23
DAPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
DAPP Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLOK vs. DAPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) and VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLOK	DAPP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.73	0.70	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.20	1.31	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.15	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.80	0.90	-0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.73	1.74	-0.01

BLOK vs. DAPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLOK Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is comparable to the DAPP Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLOK and DAPP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BLOK vs. DAPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLOK drawdown since its inception was -73.33%, smaller than the maximum DAPP drawdown of -92.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOK and DAPP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLOK	DAPP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.33%	-92.61%	+19.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.64%	-48.21%	+12.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.64%	-58.88%	+23.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.33%	-91.90%	+18.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.63%	-33.81%	+24.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.99%	-61.16%	+35.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.47%	24.96%	-8.49%

Volatility

BLOK vs. DAPP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) is 12.62%, while VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) has a volatility of 18.01%. This indicates that BLOK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLOK	DAPP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.62%	18.01%	-5.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.57%	46.44%	-16.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.13%	62.22%	-23.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.52%	73.11%	-30.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.03%	72.81%	-33.78%

BLOK vs. DAPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLOK has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than DAPP's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLOK vs. DAPP - Dividend Comparison

BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while DAPP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF	0.61%	0.72%	6.00%	1.15%	0.00%	14.31%	1.88%	2.05%	1.30%
DAPP VanEck Digital Transformation ETF	0.00%	0.00%	4.04%	0.00%	0.00%	10.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLOK and DAPP in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, BLOK and DAPP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BLOK or DAPP?

DAPP has higher volatility (18.01%) compared to BLOK (12.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLOK dropped -73.33% vs DAPP's -92.61%.

Which ETF is better, BLOK or DAPP?

On 5-year performance, BLOK leads with 12.71% vs 0.56% for DAPP. On fees, DAPP is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, BLOK has been the lower-risk option at 12.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BLOK or DAPP?

Over the 5-year period, BLOK has performed better with a 12.71% return vs 0.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLOK or DAPP?

DAPP is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BLOK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLOK or DAPP?

BLOK has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.00% for DAPP.

What is the main difference between BLOK and DAPP?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BLOK and 0.52% for DAPP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.