BLOK vs. ARKF
BLOK (Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF) and ARKF (ARK Fintech Innovation ETF) are both Blockchain funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BLOK returned 11.52%/yr vs -4.30%/yr for ARKF. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BLOK charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKF.
Performance
BLOK vs. ARKF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLOK achieves a 7.03% return, which is significantly higher than ARKF's -13.25% return.
BLOK
- 1D
- -2.95%
- 1M
- -4.92%
- 6M
- -2.25%
- YTD
- 7.03%
- 1Y
- 4.84%
- 3Y*
- 35.64%
- 5Y*
- 11.52%
- 10Y*
- —
ARKF
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 6.19%
- 6M
- -16.15%
- YTD
- -13.25%
- 1Y
- -18.91%
- 3Y*
- 20.97%
- 5Y*
- -4.30%
- 10Y*
- —
BLOK vs. ARKF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF | 7.03% | 32.64% | 53.12% | 99.62% | -62.36% | 30.76% | 90.17% | 15.82% |
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF | -13.25% | 28.67% | 34.34% | 93.27% | -65.07% | -17.82% | 108.03% | 20.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLOK and ARKF is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2019 | 0.80 |
The correlation between BLOK and ARKF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
BLOK vs. ARKF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BLOK
ARKF
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
BLOK
ARKF
Technology
BLOK
ARKF
Consumer Cyclical
BLOK
ARKF
Communication Services
BLOK
ARKF
Industrials
BLOK
ARKF
-
Real Estate
BLOK
ARKF
-
Basic Materials
BLOK
-
ARKF
-
Consumer Defensive
BLOK
-
ARKF
-
Energy
BLOK
-
ARKF
-
Healthcare
BLOK
-
ARKF
Utilities
BLOK
-
ARKF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLOK vs. ARKF — Risk / Return Rank
BLOK
ARKF
BLOK vs. ARKF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) and ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLOK | ARKF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.93 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | -0.49 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.29 | -0.83 | +1.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLOK vs. ARKF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLOK drawdown since its inception was -73.33%, smaller than the maximum ARKF drawdown of -78.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOK and ARKF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLOK | ARKF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.33% | -78.63% | +5.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.64% | -38.50% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.64% | -38.50% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.33% | -75.30% | +1.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.26% | -34.97% | +17.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.92% | -34.97% | +9.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.83% | 22.71% | -5.88% |
Volatility
BLOK vs. ARKF - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) has a higher volatility of 10.01% compared to ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) at 8.81%. This indicates that BLOK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARKF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLOK | ARKF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.01% | 8.81% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.32% | 25.64% | +3.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.93% | 33.71% | +5.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.53% | 42.98% | -0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.99% | 39.68% | -0.69% |
BLOK vs. ARKF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLOK has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKF's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLOK vs. ARKF - Dividend Comparison
BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than ARKF's 0.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF | 0.10% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 1.25% | 0.00% |
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF | 0.80% | 0.72% | 6.00% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 14.31% | 1.88% | 2.05% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLOK and ARKF have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLOK has higher volatility (10.01%) compared to ARKF (8.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLOK dropped -73.33% vs ARKF's -78.63%.
On 5-year performance, BLOK leads with 11.52% vs -4.30% for ARKF. On fees, BLOK is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, ARKF has been the lower-risk option at 8.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BLOK has performed better with a 11.52% return vs -4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BLOK is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKF.
BLOK has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.10% for ARKF.
They also come from different issuers: Amplify and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BLOK and 0.75% for ARKF.
BLOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLOK and ARKF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer