PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
BLOK vs. BLCN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

BLOK vs. BLCN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BLOK (Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF) and BLCN (Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLOK is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Amplify, while BLCN is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Siren NASDAQ Blockchain Economy Index. BLOK is actively managed, while BLCN is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BLOK returned 11.69%/yr vs -10.03%/yr for BLCN. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BLOK charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BLCN.

Performance

BLOK vs. BLCN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) and Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLOK achieves a 14.77% return, which is significantly higher than BLCN's 8.85% return.

BLOK

1D
-1.82%
1M
2.14%
YTD
14.77%
6M
9.76%
1Y
27.49%
3Y*
48.25%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
—

BLCN

1D
-3.41%
1M
6.21%
YTD
8.85%
6M
5.98%
1Y
25.25%
3Y*
8.68%
5Y*
-10.03%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLOK vs. BLCN - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BLOK
Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF		14.77%32.64%53.12%99.62%-62.36%30.76%90.17%29.54%-25.38%
BLCN
Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF		8.85%-3.69%5.62%21.09%-51.76%4.86%60.60%33.94%-18.99%

Correlation

The correlation between BLOK and BLCN is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2018

0.76

The correlation between BLOK and BLCN shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BLOK vs. BLCN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
BLOK
BLCN

Financial Services

60.4%
45.0%

Technology

28.3%
25.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
2.4%

Communication Services

3.1%
7.5%

Industrials

1.0%
4.6%

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

1.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Utilities

-

4.2%

Financial Services

BLOK
60.4%
BLCN
45.0%

Technology

BLOK
28.3%
BLCN
25.2%

Consumer Cyclical

BLOK
6.2%
BLCN
2.4%

Communication Services

BLOK
3.1%
BLCN
7.5%

Industrials

BLOK
1.0%
BLCN
4.6%

Real Estate

BLOK
0.0%
BLCN

-

Basic Materials

BLOK

-

BLCN
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

BLOK

-

BLCN

-

Energy

BLOK

-

BLCN

-

Healthcare

BLOK

-

BLCN

-

Utilities

BLOK

-

BLCN
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF

Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF

Often compared with BLOK:
BLOK vs. BKCHBLOK vs. BITQBLOK vs. DAPPBLOK vs. ARKFBLOK vs. BLOXBLOK vs. WGMIBLOK vs. IBLC
Often compared with BLCN:
BLCN vs. DAPPBLCN vs. FINXBLCN vs. BITWBLCN vs. COSTBLCN vs. VOOBLCN vs. GBTCBLCN vs. ROBO

Return for Risk

BLOK vs. BLCN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
BLOK
BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
BLCN
BLCN Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BLCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLCN Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
BLCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLCN Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLOK vs. BLCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) and Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

BLOKBLCNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.71
0.69

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.17
1.18

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.14

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

0.86

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.67

1.81

-0.14

BLOK vs. BLCN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLOK Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the BLCN Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLOK and BLCN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BLOK vs. BLCN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLOK drawdown since its inception was -73.33%, which is greater than BLCN's maximum drawdown of -67.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOK and BLCN.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

BLOKBLCNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.33%

-67.51%

-5.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.64%

-29.53%

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.64%

-45.26%

+9.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.33%

-67.51%

-5.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.27%

-47.17%

+35.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.99%

-30.38%

+4.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.48%

13.97%

+2.51%

Volatility

BLOK vs. BLCN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) is 12.42%, while Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) has a volatility of 14.35%. This indicates that BLOK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

BLOKBLCNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.42%

14.35%

-1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.64%

27.56%

+2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.10%

36.88%

+2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.53%

35.21%

+7.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.03%

31.32%

+7.71%

BLOK vs. BLCN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLOK has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCN's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLOK vs. BLCN - Dividend Comparison

BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than BLCN's 2.77% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BLCN
Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF		2.77%3.01%0.67%0.54%1.28%0.56%0.58%1.45%1.16%
BLOK
Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF		0.62%0.72%6.00%1.15%0.00%14.31%1.88%2.05%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

BLOK and BLCN have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLCN has higher volatility (14.35%) compared to BLOK (12.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLOK dropped -73.33% vs BLCN's -67.51%.

On 5-year performance, BLOK leads with 11.69% vs -10.03% for BLCN. On fees, BLCN is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, BLOK has been the lower-risk option at 12.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BLOK has performed better with a 11.69% return vs -10.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BLCN is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BLOK.

BLCN has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 0.62% for BLOK.

BLOK is categorized as Blockchain, while BLCN is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BLOK and 0.68% for BLCN.

BLOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLOK and BLCN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer