MET vs. AAPL
MET (MetLife, Inc.) and AAPL (Apple Inc) are both stocks. MET operates in Insurance - Life (Financial Services), while AAPL operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology). Over the past 10 years, MET returned 14.00%/yr vs 29.36%/yr for AAPL. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MET vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MET achieves a 14.21% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 7.29% return. Over the past 10 years, MET has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 14.00%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 29.36% annualized return.
MET
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 13.78%
- YTD
- 14.21%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- 1Y
- 15.84%
- 3Y*
- 20.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.04%
- 10Y*
- 14.00%
AAPL
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 6M
- 4.81%
- 1Y
- 46.73%
- 3Y*
- 17.21%
- 5Y*
- 18.59%
- 10Y*
- 29.36%
MET vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET MetLife, Inc. | 14.21% | -0.80% | 27.68% | -5.49% | 19.23% | 37.43% | -3.42% | 28.84% | -15.77% | 21.67% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 7.29% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 82.31% | 88.96% | -5.39% | 48.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between MET and AAPL is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2000 | 0.30 |
Fundamentals
MET:
$7.21
AAPL:
$8.24
MET:
12.33
AAPL:
35.35
MET:
0.41
AAPL:
4.65
MET:
0.58
AAPL:
9.60
MET:
$76.95B
AAPL:
$451.44B
MET:
$14.75B
AAPL:
$216.07B
MET:
$4.11B
AAPL:
$153.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MET vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank
MET
AAPL
MET vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MET | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.38 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 3.40 | -2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.48 | 8.47 | -6.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MET vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MET drawdown since its inception was -82.37%, roughly equal to the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MET and AAPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MET | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.37% | -81.80% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.46% | -13.80% | -3.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.97% | -33.36% | +11.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.09% | -33.36% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.16% | -38.52% | -16.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.64% | +7.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.62% | -29.59% | +11.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.42% | 5.53% | +0.89% |
Volatility
MET vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MetLife, Inc. (MET) is 6.17%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that MET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MET | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.17% | 6.73% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.44% | 16.53% | +0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.16% | 22.64% | +0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.72% | 27.52% | -1.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.70% | 28.92% | +1.78% |
Dividends
MET vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
MET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than AAPL's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.36% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
MET MetLife, Inc. | 2.58% | 2.85% | 2.63% | 3.12% | 2.74% | 3.04% | 3.88% | 3.41% | 4.04% | 14.52% | 2.92% | 3.06% |
Financials
MET vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MetLife, Inc. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MET vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison
MET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 19.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
AAPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.
MET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 19.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
AAPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.
MET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported a net income of 1.19B and revenue of 19.07B, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.
AAPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MET and AAPL have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAPL has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to MET (6.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MET dropped -82.37% vs AAPL's -81.80%.
AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MET and AAPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer