MET vs. RNR
Compare and contrast key facts about MetLife, Inc. (MET) and RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MET or RNR.
Correlation
The correlation between MET and RNR is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MET vs. RNR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MET:
1.23
RNR:
1.02
MET:
1.63
RNR:
1.45
MET:
1.24
RNR:
1.20
MET:
2.24
RNR:
1.60
MET:
6.49
RNR:
4.43
MET:
4.20%
RNR:
5.70%
MET:
22.15%
RNR:
24.79%
MET:
-82.93%
RNR:
-45.67%
MET:
-3.76%
RNR:
-11.17%
Fundamentals
MET:
$58.81B
RNR:
$13.24B
MET:
$4.93
RNR:
$72.06
MET:
17.23
RNR:
3.54
MET:
0.15
RNR:
-3.13
MET:
$52.32B
RNR:
$9.16B
MET:
$52.32B
RNR:
$9.22B
MET:
$4.48B
RNR:
$3.12B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MET achieves a 3.72% return, which is significantly higher than RNR's 2.49% return. Over the past 10 years, MET has underperformed RNR with an annualized return of 9.65%, while RNR has yielded a comparatively higher 11.25% annualized return.
MET
3.72%
2.65%
13.19%
28.40%
13.99%
9.65%
RNR
2.49%
-2.01%
11.48%
22.68%
6.61%
11.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MET vs. RNR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MET
RNR
MET vs. RNR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MetLife, Inc. (MET) and RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MET vs. RNR - Dividend Comparison
MET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than RNR's 0.61% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET MetLife, Inc. | 2.54% | 2.63% | 3.12% | 2.74% | 3.04% | 3.88% | 3.41% | 4.04% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RNR RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. | 0.61% | 0.63% | 0.78% | 0.80% | 0.85% | 0.84% | 0.69% | 0.99% | 1.02% | 0.91% | 1.06% | 1.19% |
Drawdowns
MET vs. RNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MET drawdown since its inception was -82.93%, which is greater than RNR's maximum drawdown of -45.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MET and RNR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MET vs. RNR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MetLife, Inc. (MET) is 6.68%, while RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) has a volatility of 8.13%. This indicates that MET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MET vs. RNR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MetLife, Inc. and RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities