MET vs. PGR

In the year-to-date period, MET achieves a -15.10% return, which is significantly lower than PGR's 9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, MET has underperformed PGR with an annualized return of 7.08%, while PGR has yielded a comparatively higher 28.55% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MetLife, Inc. (MET) and The Progressive Corporation (PGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MET Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the PGR Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MET and PGR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

MET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than PGR's 1.90% yield.

The maximum MET drawdown since its inception was -82.93%, which is greater than PGR's maximum drawdown of -71.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MET and PGR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

MetLife, Inc. (MET) has a higher volatility of 15.11% compared to The Progressive Corporation (PGR) at 12.79%. This indicates that MET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MetLife, Inc. and The Progressive Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.