MET vs. AIG
Compare and contrast key facts about MetLife, Inc. (MET) and American International Group, Inc. (AIG).
Performance
MET vs. AIG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MET vs. AIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET MetLife, Inc. | -9.20% | -0.80% | 27.68% | -5.49% | 19.23% | 37.43% | -3.42% | 28.84% | -15.77% | 21.67% |
AIG American International Group, Inc. | -11.16% | 20.03% | 9.75% | 9.79% | 13.76% | 53.92% | -23.08% | 33.58% | -32.09% | -6.86% |
Fundamentals
MET:
$7.54
AIG:
$4.14
MET:
9.44
AIG:
18.27
MET:
0.22
AIG:
0.77
MET:
0.42
AIG:
2.13
MET:
$76.13B
AIG:
$20.22B
MET:
$12.20B
AIG:
$7.02B
MET:
$4.34B
AIG:
$6.09B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MET achieves a -9.20% return, which is significantly higher than AIG's -11.16% return. Over the past 10 years, MET has outperformed AIG with an annualized return of 10.93%, while AIG has yielded a comparatively lower 5.86% annualized return.
MET
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -2.83%
- YTD
- -9.20%
- 6M
- -11.88%
- 1Y
- -9.70%
- 3Y*
- 10.46%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 10.93%
AIG
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -6.30%
- YTD
- -11.16%
- 6M
- -4.06%
- 1Y
- -11.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.03%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- 5.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MET vs. AIG — Risk / Return Rank
MET
AIG
MET vs. AIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MetLife, Inc. (MET) and American International Group, Inc. (AIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MET | AIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | -0.43 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | -0.43 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.94 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | -0.66 | +0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | -1.23 | -0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MET | AIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.34 | -0.43 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.48 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.18 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.05 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between MET and AIG is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MET vs. AIG - Dividend Comparison
MET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than AIG's 2.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET MetLife, Inc. | 3.19% | 2.85% | 2.63% | 3.12% | 2.74% | 3.04% | 3.88% | 3.41% | 4.04% | 14.52% | 2.92% | 3.06% |
AIG American International Group, Inc. | 2.38% | 2.05% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 3.38% | 2.49% | 3.25% | 2.15% | 1.96% | 1.31% |
Drawdowns
MET vs. AIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MET drawdown since its inception was -82.37%, smaller than the maximum AIG drawdown of -99.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MET and AIG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MET | AIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.37% | -99.64% | +17.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.46% | -16.98% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.09% | -26.45% | -8.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.16% | -69.58% | +14.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.42% | -93.85% | +77.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.71% | -51.04% | +33.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.08% | 9.07% | -1.99% |
Volatility
MET vs. AIG - Volatility Comparison
MetLife, Inc. (MET) and American International Group, Inc. (AIG) have volatilities of 6.50% and 6.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MET | AIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 6.44% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.82% | 18.98% | -1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.52% | 25.58% | +2.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.67% | 26.61% | -0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.73% | 32.52% | -1.79% |
Financials
MET vs. AIG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MetLife, Inc. and American International Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities