MET vs. AIG
MET (MetLife, Inc.) and AIG (American International Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — MET in Insurance - Life, AIG in Insurance - Diversified. Over the past 10 years, MET returned 14.63%/yr vs 6.83%/yr for AIG. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MET vs. AIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MET achieves a 12.57% return, which is significantly higher than AIG's -9.61% return. Over the past 10 years, MET has outperformed AIG with an annualized return of 14.63%, while AIG has yielded a comparatively lower 6.83% annualized return.
MET
- 1D
- 2.31%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- 12.57%
- 6M
- 9.23%
- 1Y
- 13.86%
- 3Y*
- 21.60%
- 5Y*
- 11.47%
- 10Y*
- 14.63%
AIG
- 1D
- 3.17%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- -9.61%
- 6M
- -10.53%
- 1Y
- -8.15%
- 3Y*
- 13.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.38%
- 10Y*
- 6.83%
MET vs. AIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET MetLife, Inc. | 12.57% | -0.80% | 27.68% | -5.49% | 19.23% | 37.43% | -3.42% | 28.84% | -15.77% | 21.67% |
AIG American International Group, Inc. | -9.61% | 20.03% | 9.75% | 9.79% | 13.76% | 53.92% | -23.08% | 33.58% | -32.09% | -6.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between MET and AIG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2000 | 0.60 |
The correlation between MET and AIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.72 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MET:
$7.21
AIG:
$4.25
MET:
12.15
AIG:
17.96
MET:
0.57
AIG:
2.15
MET:
$76.95B
AIG:
$20.00B
MET:
$14.75B
AIG:
$7.09B
MET:
$4.11B
AIG:
$5.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MET vs. AIG — Risk / Return Rank
MET
AIG
MET vs. AIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MetLife, Inc. (MET) and American International Group, Inc. (AIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MET | AIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.96 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | -0.48 | +1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.16 | -0.84 | +3.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MET vs. AIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MET drawdown since its inception was -82.37%, smaller than the maximum AIG drawdown of -99.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MET and AIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MET | AIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.37% | -99.64% | +17.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.46% | -16.98% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.97% | -16.98% | -4.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.09% | -26.45% | -8.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.16% | -69.58% | +14.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | -93.75% | +92.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.61% | -51.26% | +33.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.42% | 9.69% | -3.27% |
Volatility
MET vs. AIG - Volatility Comparison
MetLife, Inc. (MET) and American International Group, Inc. (AIG) have volatilities of 6.72% and 6.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MET | AIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.72% | 6.73% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.49% | 17.44% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.26% | 23.83% | -0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.59% | 26.46% | -0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.71% | 32.63% | -1.92% |
Dividends
MET vs. AIG - Dividend Comparison
MET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than AIG's 2.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIG American International Group, Inc. | 2.42% | 2.05% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 3.38% | 2.49% | 3.25% | 2.15% | 1.96% | 1.31% |
MET MetLife, Inc. | 2.62% | 2.85% | 2.63% | 3.12% | 2.74% | 3.04% | 3.88% | 3.41% | 4.04% | 14.52% | 2.92% | 3.06% |
Financials
MET vs. AIG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MetLife, Inc. and American International Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MET and AIG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIG has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to MET (6.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MET dropped -82.37% vs AIG's -99.64%.
MET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MET and AIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer