PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPL vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AAPL vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apple Inc (AAPL) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPL achieves a 16.20% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 13.25% return. Over the past 10 years, AAPL has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 30.40%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 66.42% annualized return.


AAPL

1D
-0.28%
1M
8.14%
6M
21.80%
YTD
16.20%
1Y
49.04%
3Y*
19.35%
5Y*
17.39%
10Y*
30.40%

NVDA

1D
4.03%
1M
5.26%
6M
14.26%
YTD
13.25%
1Y
28.73%
3Y*
70.82%
5Y*
60.22%
10Y*
66.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPL vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAPL
Apple Inc
16.20%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
13.25%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPL and NVDA is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1999

0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between AAPL and NVDA has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AAPL:

$4.63T

NVDA:

$5.11T

EPS

AAPL:

$8.25

NVDA:

$6.53

PE Ratio

AAPL:

38.23

NVDA:

32.33

PEG Ratio

AAPL:

5.03

NVDA:

0.18

PS Ratio

AAPL:

10.38

NVDA:

20.36

PB Ratio

AAPL:

43.73

NVDA:

26.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

AAPL:

$451.44B

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AAPL:

$216.07B

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

AAPL:

$153.63B

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPL vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPL vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc (AAPL) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAPLNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.16

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

1.43

+2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.50

3.09

+5.41

AAPL vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPL Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPL and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAPL vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPL drawdown since its inception was -81.80%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPLNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.80%

-89.72%

+7.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-20.21%

+6.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.36%

-36.88%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.36%

-66.34%

+32.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.52%

-66.34%

+27.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-10.41%

+10.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.56%

-36.12%

+6.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.79%

9.32%

-3.53%

Volatility

AAPL vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Apple Inc (AAPL) is 9.95%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that AAPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPLNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.95%

10.90%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.77%

27.21%

-8.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.07%

35.49%

-11.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.77%

51.83%

-24.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.04%

49.87%

-20.83%

Dividends

AAPL vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, more than NVDA's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.33%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.13%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

AAPL vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apple Inc and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
111.18B
81.62B
(AAPL) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AAPL vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Apple Inc and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
49.3%
74.9%
Portfolio components
AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AAPL and NVDA have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to AAPL (9.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPL dropped -81.80% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPL and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer