MET vs. GL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Globe Life Inc. (GL).

Performance

MET vs. GL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Globe Life Inc. (GL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MET vs. GL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MET MetLife, Inc.	-9.77%	-0.80%	27.68%	-5.49%	19.23%	37.43%	-3.42%	28.84%	-15.77%	21.67%
GL Globe Life Inc.	-0.30%	26.47%	-7.53%	1.77%	29.68%	-0.49%	-8.93%	42.34%	-17.23%	23.93%

Fundamentals

EPS MET : $7.54 GL : $14.18
PE Ratio MET : 9.38 GL : 9.81
PEG Ratio MET : 0.22 GL : 0.53
PS Ratio MET : 0.42 GL : 1.90
Total Revenue (TTM) MET : $76.13B GL : $6.00B
Gross Profit (TTM) MET : $12.20B GL : $2.00B
EBITDA (TTM) MET : $4.34B GL : $1.59B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MET achieves a -9.77% return, which is significantly lower than GL's -0.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MET having a 10.86% annualized return and GL not far behind at 10.68%.

MET

• 1D: 3.59%
• 1M: -1.87%
• YTD: -9.77%
• 6M: -12.90%
• 1Y: -9.30%
• 3Y*: 10.23%
• 5Y*: 5.97%
• 10Y*: 10.86%

GL

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: -4.19%
• YTD: -0.30%
• 6M: -2.28%
• 1Y: 6.52%
• 3Y*: 9.01%
• 5Y*: 7.97%
• 10Y*: 10.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MET vs. GL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MET

MET Risk / Return Rank: 25
MET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
MET Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
MET Omega Ratio Rank: 24
MET Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
MET Martin Ratio Rank: 21

GL

GL Risk / Return Rank: 50
GL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
GL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
GL Omega Ratio Rank: 44
GL Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
GL Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MET vs. GL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Globe Life Inc. (GL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MET	GL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.33	0.26	-0.59
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.26	0.55	-0.81
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.07	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.46	0.55	-1.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.15	1.21	-2.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MET vs. GL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MET Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the GL Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MET and GL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MET	GL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.33	0.26	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	0.22	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.33	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.40	-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between MET and GL is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

MET vs. GL - Dividend Comparison

MET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, more than GL's 0.78% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MET MetLife, Inc.	3.21%	2.85%	2.63%	3.12%	2.74%	3.04%	3.88%	3.41%	4.04%	14.52%	2.92%	3.06%
GL Globe Life Inc.	0.78%	0.75%	0.85%	0.73%	0.68%	0.83%	0.77%	0.64%	0.85%	0.65%	0.75%	0.71%

Drawdowns

MET vs. GL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MET drawdown since its inception was -82.37%, which is greater than GL's maximum drawdown of -75.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MET and GL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MET	GL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.37%	-75.34%	-7.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.46%	-14.70%	-2.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.09%	-61.62%	+26.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.16%	-61.62%	+6.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.95%	-5.29%	-11.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.71%	-12.23%	-5.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.03%	6.73%	+0.30%

Volatility

MET vs. GL - Volatility Comparison

MetLife, Inc. (MET) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to Globe Life Inc. (GL) at 5.09%. This indicates that MET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MET	GL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.49%	5.09%	+1.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.81%	12.93%	+4.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.54%	24.98%	+3.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.68%	35.72%	-10.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.74%	32.15%	-1.41%

Financials

MET vs. GL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MetLife, Inc. and Globe Life Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 23.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Globe Life Inc. reported a gross profit of 462.61M and revenue of 1.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.4%.

MET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 23.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

GL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Globe Life Inc. reported an operating income of 356.26M and revenue of 1.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.4%.

MET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported a net income of 809.00M and revenue of 23.81B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.

GL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Globe Life Inc. reported a net income of 266.00M and revenue of 1.52B, resulting in a net margin of 17.5%.