MET vs. GL
Compare and contrast key facts about MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Globe Life Inc. (GL).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MET or GL.
Correlation
The correlation between MET and GL is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
MET vs. GL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MET:
1.12
GL:
-0.22
MET:
1.52
GL:
0.24
MET:
1.22
GL:
1.07
MET:
1.99
GL:
-0.23
MET:
6.49
GL:
-0.60
MET:
3.79%
GL:
23.79%
MET:
21.87%
GL:
65.05%
MET:
-82.93%
GL:
-75.34%
MET:
-10.72%
GL:
-18.07%
Fundamentals
MET:
$56.26B
GL:
$8.88B
MET:
$4.93
GL:
$11.81
MET:
16.48
GL:
8.96
MET:
$71.35B
GL:
$5.73B
MET:
$71.35B
GL:
$5.34B
MET:
$3.06B
GL:
$321.75M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MET achieves a 22.88% return, which is significantly higher than GL's -13.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MET having a 7.81% annualized return and GL not far behind at 7.65%.
MET
22.88%
-5.49%
14.50%
22.38%
12.82%
7.81%
GL
-13.41%
-4.85%
30.57%
-14.66%
0.45%
7.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MET vs. GL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Globe Life Inc. (GL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MET vs. GL - Dividend Comparison
MET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than GL's 0.90% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET MetLife, Inc. | 2.75% | 3.12% | 2.74% | 3.04% | 3.88% | 3.41% | 4.04% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GL Globe Life Inc. | 0.90% | 0.73% | 0.68% | 0.83% | 0.78% | 0.65% | 0.85% | 0.65% | 0.75% | 0.71% | 0.94% | 1.06% |
Drawdowns
MET vs. GL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MET drawdown since its inception was -82.93%, which is greater than GL's maximum drawdown of -75.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MET and GL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MET vs. GL - Volatility Comparison
MetLife, Inc. (MET) has a higher volatility of 7.89% compared to Globe Life Inc. (GL) at 5.08%. This indicates that MET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MET vs. GL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MetLife, Inc. and Globe Life Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities