MET vs. AFL
Compare and contrast key facts about MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MET or AFL.
Correlation
The correlation between MET and AFL is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
MET vs. AFL - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
MET:
0.45
AFL:
1.13
MET:
0.78
AFL:
1.59
MET:
1.12
AFL:
1.24
MET:
0.61
AFL:
2.10
MET:
1.94
AFL:
4.72
MET:
6.96%
AFL:
5.59%
MET:
29.40%
AFL:
22.45%
MET:
-82.93%
AFL:
-82.71%
MET:
-7.14%
AFL:
-6.38%
Fundamentals
MET:
$54.01B
AFL:
$57.75B
MET:
$6.12
AFL:
$6.43
MET:
13.15
AFL:
16.61
MET:
1.10
AFL:
0.93
MET:
0.73
AFL:
3.42
MET:
1.96
AFL:
2.17
MET:
$72.92B
AFL:
$17.09B
MET:
$72.92B
AFL:
$13.64B
MET:
$6.39B
AFL:
$4.39B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MET achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly lower than AFL's 3.85% return. Over the past 10 years, MET has underperformed AFL with an annualized return of 8.31%, while AFL has yielded a comparatively higher 15.44% annualized return.
MET
0.08%
13.57%
-1.66%
13.23%
24.65%
8.31%
AFL
3.85%
-0.48%
-3.07%
25.13%
29.70%
15.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MET vs. AFL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MET
AFL
MET vs. AFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
MET vs. AFL - Dividend Comparison
MET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than AFL's 1.95% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET MetLife, Inc. | 2.75% | 2.65% | 3.12% | 2.74% | 3.04% | 3.88% | 3.41% | 4.04% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AFL Aflac Incorporated | 1.95% | 1.93% | 2.04% | 2.22% | 2.26% | 2.52% | 2.04% | 2.28% | 1.98% | 2.39% | 2.64% | 2.46% |
Drawdowns
MET vs. AFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MET drawdown since its inception was -82.93%, roughly equal to the maximum AFL drawdown of -82.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MET and AFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
MET vs. AFL - Volatility Comparison
MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL) have volatilities of 7.46% and 7.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
MET vs. AFL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MET vs. AFL - Profitability Comparison
MET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MetLife, Inc. reported a gross profit of 18.28B and revenue of 18.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
AFL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aflac Incorporated reported a gross profit of -50.00M and revenue of 3.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -1.5%.
MET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MetLife, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.35B and revenue of 18.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.
AFL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aflac Incorporated reported an operating income of 145.00M and revenue of 3.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.
MET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MetLife, Inc. reported a net income of 945.00M and revenue of 18.28B, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.
AFL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aflac Incorporated reported a net income of 29.00M and revenue of 3.40B, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.