PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MET vs. PRU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


METPRU
YTD Return7.49%9.55%
1Y Return34.89%49.78%
3Y Return (Ann)6.39%8.46%
5Y Return (Ann)11.92%7.01%
10Y Return (Ann)8.32%7.80%
Sharpe Ratio1.032.27
Daily Std Dev23.70%20.15%
Max Drawdown-82.37%-88.53%
Current Drawdown-4.84%-4.38%

Fundamentals


METPRU
Market Cap$50.92B$39.71B
EPS$1.81$6.74
PE Ratio38.9116.39
PEG Ratio0.110.43
Revenue (TTM)$66.90B$53.98B
Gross Profit (TTM)$14.89B$9.95B
EBITDA (TTM)$3.92B$3.28B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between MET and PRU is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

MET vs. PRU - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MET achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly lower than PRU's 9.55% return. Over the past 10 years, MET has outperformed PRU with an annualized return of 8.32%, while PRU has yielded a comparatively lower 7.80% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
364.67%
633.67%
MET
PRU

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MetLife, Inc.

Prudential Financial, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MET vs. PRU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MET
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MET, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.03
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MET, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.47
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MET, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.20
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MET, currently valued at 0.69, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.69
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MET, currently valued at 5.90, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.005.90
PRU
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PRU, currently valued at 2.27, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.27
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PRU, currently valued at 3.12, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.12
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PRU, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.39
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PRU, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.41
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PRU, currently valued at 12.80, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0012.80

MET vs. PRU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MET Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the PRU Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of MET and PRU.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.03
2.27
MET
PRU

Dividends

MET vs. PRU - Dividend Comparison

MET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, less than PRU's 4.50% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MET
MetLife, Inc.
2.95%3.12%2.74%3.04%3.88%3.41%4.04%2.91%2.92%3.06%2.45%1.87%
PRU
Prudential Financial, Inc.
4.50%4.82%4.83%4.25%5.64%4.27%4.41%2.61%2.69%3.00%2.40%1.88%

Drawdowns

MET vs. PRU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MET drawdown since its inception was -82.37%, smaller than the maximum PRU drawdown of -88.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MET and PRU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-4.84%
-4.38%
MET
PRU

Volatility

MET vs. PRU - Volatility Comparison

MetLife, Inc. (MET) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) at 5.04%. This indicates that MET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
5.71%
5.04%
MET
PRU

Financials

MET vs. PRU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MetLife, Inc. and Prudential Financial, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items