MET vs. PRU
Compare and contrast key facts about MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MET or PRU.
Key characteristics
| MET | PRU | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 28.82% | 25.45% |
| 1Y Return | 37.81% | 39.33% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 12.28% | 9.46% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 14.83% | 11.61% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.19% | 8.65% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.76 | 1.80 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.19 | 2.25 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.33 | 1.34 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.16 | 2.33 |
| Martin Ratio | 10.39 | 8.96 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.51% | 4.44% |
| Daily Std Dev | 20.80% | 22.15% |
| Max Drawdown | -82.93% | -88.53% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.14% | -1.62% |
Fundamentals
| MET | PRU | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $56.92B | $44.67B |
| EPS | $4.93 | $11.23 |
| PE Ratio | 16.67 | 11.17 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.14 | 0.53 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $71.35B | $73.44B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $71.35B | $74.58B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $5.28B | -$159.00M |
Correlation
The correlation between MET and PRU is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
MET vs. PRU - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MET achieves a 28.82% return, which is significantly higher than PRU's 25.45% return. Over the past 10 years, MET has underperformed PRU with an annualized return of 8.19%, while PRU has yielded a comparatively higher 8.65% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MET vs. PRU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MET vs. PRU - Dividend Comparison
MET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than PRU's 4.10% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET MetLife, Inc. | 2.63% | 3.12% | 2.74% | 3.04% | 3.88% | 3.41% | 4.04% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | 4.10% | 4.82% | 4.83% | 4.25% | 5.64% | 4.27% | 4.41% | 2.61% | 2.69% | 3.00% | 2.40% | 1.88% |
Drawdowns
MET vs. PRU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MET drawdown since its inception was -82.93%, smaller than the maximum PRU drawdown of -88.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MET and PRU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MET vs. PRU - Volatility Comparison
MetLife, Inc. (MET) has a higher volatility of 9.81% compared to Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) at 9.03%. This indicates that MET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MET vs. PRU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MetLife, Inc. and Prudential Financial, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities