MET vs. PRU
MET (MetLife, Inc.) and PRU (Prudential Financial, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Insurance - Life industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, MET returned 14.63%/yr vs 9.18%/yr for PRU. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MET vs. PRU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MET achieves a 12.57% return, which is significantly higher than PRU's -1.47% return. Over the past 10 years, MET has outperformed PRU with an annualized return of 14.63%, while PRU has yielded a comparatively lower 9.18% annualized return.
MET
- 1D
- 2.31%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- 12.57%
- 6M
- 9.23%
- 1Y
- 13.86%
- 3Y*
- 21.60%
- 5Y*
- 11.47%
- 10Y*
- 14.63%
PRU
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- -1.47%
- 6M
- -3.15%
- 1Y
- 9.40%
- 3Y*
- 14.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.45%
- 10Y*
- 9.18%
MET vs. PRU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET MetLife, Inc. | 12.57% | -0.80% | 27.68% | -5.49% | 19.23% | 37.43% | -3.42% | 28.84% | -15.77% | 21.67% |
PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | -1.47% | 0.18% | 19.46% | 10.09% | -3.86% | 45.32% | -11.40% | 20.10% | -26.46% | 13.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between MET and PRU is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2001 | 0.79 |
The correlation between MET and PRU shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.87 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MET:
$7.21
PRU:
$9.85
MET:
12.15
PRU:
10.99
MET:
0.41
PRU:
0.45
MET:
0.57
PRU:
0.80
MET:
$76.95B
PRU:
$47.43B
MET:
$14.75B
PRU:
$14.72B
MET:
$4.11B
PRU:
$4.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MET vs. PRU — Risk / Return Rank
MET
PRU
MET vs. PRU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MET | PRU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.09 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 0.44 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.16 | 0.95 | +1.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MET vs. PRU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MET drawdown since its inception was -82.37%, smaller than the maximum PRU drawdown of -88.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MET and PRU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MET | PRU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.37% | -88.53% | +6.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.46% | -21.46% | +4.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.97% | -25.66% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.09% | -33.11% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.16% | -65.89% | +10.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | -9.67% | +8.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.61% | -18.31% | +0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.42% | 9.94% | -3.52% |
Volatility
MET vs. PRU - Volatility Comparison
MetLife, Inc. (MET) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) at 5.80%. This indicates that MET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MET | PRU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.72% | 5.80% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.49% | 17.51% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.26% | 22.65% | +0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.59% | 25.72% | -0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.71% | 31.83% | -1.12% |
Dividends
MET vs. PRU - Dividend Comparison
MET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than PRU's 5.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET MetLife, Inc. | 2.62% | 2.85% | 2.63% | 3.12% | 2.74% | 3.04% | 3.88% | 3.41% | 4.04% | 14.52% | 2.92% | 3.06% |
PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | 5.08% | 4.78% | 4.39% | 4.82% | 4.83% | 4.25% | 5.64% | 4.27% | 4.41% | 2.61% | 2.69% | 3.00% |
Financials
MET vs. PRU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MetLife, Inc. and Prudential Financial, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MET and PRU have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MET has higher volatility (6.72%) compared to PRU (5.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MET dropped -82.37% vs PRU's -88.53%.
MET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MET and PRU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer