PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDY vs. VOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDY vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDY achieves a 14.41% return, which is significantly higher than VOT's 7.86% return. Over the past 10 years, MDY has underperformed VOT with an annualized return of 11.40%, while VOT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.50% annualized return.


MDY

1D
-1.01%
1M
2.67%
YTD
14.41%
6M
12.36%
1Y
24.68%
3Y*
15.79%
5Y*
8.21%
10Y*
11.40%

VOT

1D
-1.99%
1M
3.19%
YTD
7.86%
6M
5.95%
1Y
10.01%
3Y*
15.69%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*
12.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDY vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF
14.41%7.19%13.64%16.07%-13.28%24.53%13.50%25.78%-11.29%15.93%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
7.86%10.72%16.38%23.10%-28.87%20.50%34.50%33.76%-5.56%21.80%

Correlation

The correlation between MDY and VOT is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2006

0.90

The correlation between MDY and VOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

MDY vs. VOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MDY
VOT

Industrials

24.8%
23.2%

Technology

17.4%
32.5%

Financial Services

13.3%
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
12.8%

Healthcare

9.1%
8.9%

Real Estate

7.4%
4.5%

Energy

5.0%
1.9%

Basic Materials

4.9%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
0.8%

Utilities

3.0%
3.2%

Communication Services

1.0%
3.6%

Industrials

MDY
24.8%
VOT
23.2%

Technology

MDY
17.4%
VOT
32.5%

Financial Services

MDY
13.3%
VOT
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

MDY
10.7%
VOT
12.8%

Healthcare

MDY
9.1%
VOT
8.9%

Real Estate

MDY
7.4%
VOT
4.5%

Energy

MDY
5.0%
VOT
1.9%

Basic Materials

MDY
4.9%
VOT
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

MDY
3.4%
VOT
0.8%

Utilities

MDY
3.0%
VOT
3.2%

Communication Services

MDY
1.0%
VOT
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDY vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDY
MDY Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDY Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
MDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDY Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

VOT
VOT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDY vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDYVOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.11

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

0.63

+2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.23

1.87

+8.35

MDY vs. VOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDY Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDY and VOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDY vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDY drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, smaller than the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDY and VOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDYVOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.33%

-60.16%

+4.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.82%

-15.96%

+7.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.03%

-21.77%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.03%

-37.19%

+13.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.22%

-37.19%

-5.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-1.99%

+0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.02%

-9.94%

+2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

5.35%

-2.93%

Volatility

MDY vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) is 4.69%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that MDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDYVOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

7.06%

-2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

13.69%

-1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.81%

16.92%

-1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.78%

21.53%

-1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.18%

21.04%

+0.14%

MDY vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDY has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than VOT's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MDY vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison

MDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than VOT's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF
1.02%1.15%1.18%1.21%1.37%0.96%1.12%1.34%1.39%1.18%1.31%1.35%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.62%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.78%0.34%0.56%0.78%0.84%0.72%0.81%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDY and VOT have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOT has higher volatility (7.06%) compared to MDY (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDY dropped -55.33% vs VOT's -60.16%.

On 10-year performance, VOT leads with 12.50% vs 11.40% for MDY. On fees, VOT is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOT has performed better with a 12.50% return vs 11.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOT is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for MDY.

MDY has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.62% for VOT.

MDY is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VOT is Mid Cap Growth Equities. MDY tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while VOT tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for MDY and 0.05% for VOT.

MDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDY and VOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer