MDY vs. VOT
MDY (SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF) and VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MDY is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index, while VOT is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MDY returned 11.05%/yr vs 12.27%/yr for VOT. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MDY charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VOT.
Performance
MDY vs. VOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDY achieves a 14.02% return, which is significantly higher than VOT's 9.30% return. Over the past 10 years, MDY has underperformed VOT with an annualized return of 11.05%, while VOT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.27% annualized return.
MDY
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 14.02%
- 6M
- 15.05%
- 1Y
- 26.67%
- 3Y*
- 15.81%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.05%
VOT
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 6.78%
- YTD
- 9.30%
- 6M
- 8.27%
- 1Y
- 13.50%
- 3Y*
- 16.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.31%
- 10Y*
- 12.27%
MDY vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 14.02% | 7.19% | 13.64% | 16.07% | -13.28% | 24.53% | 13.50% | 25.78% | -11.29% | 15.93% |
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 9.30% | 10.72% | 16.38% | 23.10% | -28.87% | 20.50% | 34.50% | 33.76% | -5.56% | 21.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDY and VOT is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2006 | 0.90 |
The correlation between MDY and VOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
MDY vs. VOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDY
VOT
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
MDY
VOT
Technology
MDY
VOT
Financial Services
MDY
VOT
Consumer Cyclical
MDY
VOT
Healthcare
MDY
VOT
Real Estate
MDY
VOT
Energy
MDY
VOT
Basic Materials
MDY
VOT
Consumer Defensive
MDY
VOT
Utilities
MDY
VOT
Communication Services
MDY
VOT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDY vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank
MDY
VOT
MDY vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDY | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.73 | 0.86 | +0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.52 | 1.28 | +1.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.15 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 0.89 | +2.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.99 | 2.68 | +8.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDY | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | 0.86 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.34 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.59 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.45 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
MDY vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDY drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, smaller than the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDY and VOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDY | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.33% | -60.16% | +4.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -15.96% | +7.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.03% | -21.77% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.03% | -37.19% | +13.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.22% | -37.19% | -5.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -9.97% | +2.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 5.32% | -2.90% |
Volatility
MDY vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) have volatilities of 4.40% and 4.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDY | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.40% | 4.22% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.30% | 12.35% | -1.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.48% | 15.80% | -0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 21.36% | -1.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 20.99% | +0.20% |
MDY vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDY has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than VOT's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MDY vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison
MDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than VOT's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 0.96% | 1.12% | 1.34% | 1.39% | 1.18% | 1.31% | 1.35% |
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.61% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.56% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDY and VOT have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDY has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to VOT (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDY dropped -55.33% vs VOT's -60.16%.
On 10-year performance, VOT leads with 12.27% vs 11.05% for MDY. On fees, VOT is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VOT has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOT has performed better with a 12.27% return vs 11.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOT is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for MDY.
MDY has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.61% for VOT.
MDY is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VOT is Mid Cap Growth Equities. MDY tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while VOT tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for MDY and 0.07% for VOT.
MDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDY and VOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer