MDY vs. VO
MDY (SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF) and VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - MDY tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index while VO tracks the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MDY returned 11.52%/yr vs 12.03%/yr for VO. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MDY charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VO.
Performance
MDY vs. VO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDY achieves a 15.58% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 11.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MDY having a 11.52% annualized return and VO not far ahead at 12.03%.
MDY
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 15.58%
- 6M
- 13.18%
- 1Y
- 27.09%
- 3Y*
- 16.19%
- 5Y*
- 8.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.52%
VO
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 11.30%
- 6M
- 9.77%
- 1Y
- 19.89%
- 3Y*
- 16.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.06%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
MDY vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 15.58% | 7.19% | 13.64% | 16.07% | -13.28% | 24.53% | 13.50% | 25.78% | -11.29% | 15.93% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 11.30% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDY and VO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.95 |
The correlation between MDY and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
MDY vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDY
VO
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
MDY
VO
Technology
MDY
VO
Financial Services
MDY
VO
Consumer Cyclical
MDY
VO
Healthcare
MDY
VO
Real Estate
MDY
VO
Energy
MDY
VO
Basic Materials
MDY
VO
Consumer Defensive
MDY
VO
Utilities
MDY
VO
Communication Services
MDY
VO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDY vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank
MDY
VO
MDY vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDY | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.27 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 2.45 | +0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.23 | 9.23 | +2.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDY vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDY drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDY and VO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDY | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.33% | -58.87% | +3.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -8.17% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.03% | -19.02% | -5.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.03% | -27.57% | +3.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.22% | -39.37% | -2.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.45% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -7.85% | +0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 2.16% | +0.26% |
Volatility
MDY vs. VO - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) have volatilities of 4.53% and 4.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDY | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 4.35% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.65% | 9.80% | +1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.80% | 12.80% | +3.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 17.66% | +2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 18.98% | +2.24% |
MDY vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDY has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MDY vs. VO - Dividend Comparison
MDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than VO's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 1.01% | 1.15% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 0.96% | 1.12% | 1.34% | 1.39% | 1.18% | 1.31% | 1.35% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.35% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, MDY and VO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MDY has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to VO (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDY dropped -55.33% vs VO's -58.87%.
On 10-year performance, VO leads with 12.03% vs 11.52% for MDY. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 12.03% return vs 11.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for MDY.
VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 1.01% for MDY.
MDY tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for MDY and 0.03% for VO.
MDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDY and VO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer