PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDY vs. VO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDY vs. VO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDY achieves a 15.58% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 11.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MDY having a 11.52% annualized return and VO not far ahead at 12.03%.


MDY

1D
0.41%
1M
3.71%
YTD
15.58%
6M
13.18%
1Y
27.09%
3Y*
16.19%
5Y*
8.64%
10Y*
11.52%

VO

1D
0.44%
1M
3.04%
YTD
11.30%
6M
9.77%
1Y
19.89%
3Y*
16.59%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDY vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF
15.58%7.19%13.64%16.07%-13.28%24.53%13.50%25.78%-11.29%15.93%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
11.30%11.62%15.31%16.03%-18.73%24.70%18.10%30.98%-9.24%19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between MDY and VO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.95

The correlation between MDY and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

MDY vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MDY
VO

Industrials

24.8%
17.7%

Technology

17.4%
20.8%

Financial Services

13.3%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
8.6%

Healthcare

9.1%
7.5%

Real Estate

7.4%
5.1%

Energy

5.0%
7.9%

Basic Materials

4.9%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
4.7%

Utilities

3.0%
7.9%

Communication Services

1.0%
3.0%

Industrials

MDY
24.8%
VO
17.7%

Technology

MDY
17.4%
VO
20.8%

Financial Services

MDY
13.3%
VO
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

MDY
10.7%
VO
8.6%

Healthcare

MDY
9.1%
VO
7.5%

Real Estate

MDY
7.4%
VO
5.1%

Energy

MDY
5.0%
VO
7.9%

Basic Materials

MDY
4.9%
VO
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

MDY
3.4%
VO
4.7%

Utilities

MDY
3.0%
VO
7.9%

Communication Services

MDY
1.0%
VO
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDY vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDY
MDY Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
MDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDY Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDY Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

VO
VO Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDY vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDYVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.27

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

2.45

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.23

9.23

+2.00

MDY vs. VO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDY Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the VO Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDY and VO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDY vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDY drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDY and VO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDYVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.33%

-58.87%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.82%

-8.17%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.03%

-19.02%

-5.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.03%

-27.57%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.22%

-39.37%

-2.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.45%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.02%

-7.85%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

2.16%

+0.26%

Volatility

MDY vs. VO - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) have volatilities of 4.53% and 4.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDYVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

4.35%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.65%

9.80%

+1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.80%

12.80%

+3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.78%

17.66%

+2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.22%

18.98%

+2.24%

MDY vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDY has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MDY vs. VO - Dividend Comparison

MDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than VO's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF
1.01%1.15%1.18%1.21%1.37%0.96%1.12%1.34%1.39%1.18%1.31%1.35%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.35%1.52%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, MDY and VO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MDY has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to VO (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDY dropped -55.33% vs VO's -58.87%.

On 10-year performance, VO leads with 12.03% vs 11.52% for MDY. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 12.03% return vs 11.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for MDY.

VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 1.01% for MDY.

MDY tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for MDY and 0.03% for VO.

MDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDY and VO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer