MDY vs. VO
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO).
MDY and VO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MDY is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on May 4, 1995. VO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both MDY and VO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MDY or VO.
Correlation
The correlation between MDY and VO is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
MDY vs. VO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MDY:
0.89
VO:
1.40
MDY:
1.33
VO:
1.95
MDY:
1.16
VO:
1.25
MDY:
1.70
VO:
1.69
MDY:
4.71
VO:
7.74
MDY:
3.02%
VO:
2.26%
MDY:
15.97%
VO:
12.49%
MDY:
-55.33%
VO:
-58.88%
MDY:
-7.49%
VO:
-5.89%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDY achieves a 14.04% return, which is significantly lower than VO's 16.46% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MDY having a 9.36% annualized return and VO not far ahead at 9.56%.
MDY
14.04%
-6.06%
6.88%
13.79%
10.20%
9.36%
VO
16.46%
-4.96%
10.17%
17.00%
10.16%
9.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MDY vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDY has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MDY vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MDY vs. VO - Dividend Comparison
MDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than VO's 1.48% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 0.96% | 1.12% | 1.34% | 1.39% | 1.18% | 1.31% | 1.35% | 1.17% | 1.07% |
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.48% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% | 1.29% | 1.18% |
Drawdowns
MDY vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDY drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDY and VO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MDY vs. VO - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 4.46%. This indicates that MDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.