VOT vs. FMDGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX).
VOT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. It was launched on Aug 17, 2006. FMDGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 11, 2019.
Performance
VOT vs. FMDGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VOT vs. FMDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -7.62% | 10.72% | 16.38% | 23.10% | -28.87% | 20.50% | 34.50% | 4.73% |
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | -9.61% | 8.60% | 22.03% | 25.79% | -26.67% | 12.67% | 34.84% | 4.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOT achieves a -7.62% return, which is significantly higher than FMDGX's -9.61% return.
VOT
- 1D
- 3.09%
- 1M
- -7.40%
- YTD
- -7.62%
- 6M
- -12.08%
- 1Y
- 5.90%
- 3Y*
- 10.49%
- 5Y*
- 4.04%
- 10Y*
- 10.62%
FMDGX
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -9.53%
- YTD
- -9.61%
- 6M
- -12.95%
- 1Y
- 5.72%
- 3Y*
- 11.35%
- 5Y*
- 4.59%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VOT vs. FMDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOT has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FMDGX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
VOT vs. FMDGX — Risk / Return Rank
VOT
FMDGX
VOT vs. FMDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VOT | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.28 | 0.24 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.55 | 0.51 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.07 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 0.22 | +0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.20 | 0.69 | +0.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VOT | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 | 0.24 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.21 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.36 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between VOT and FMDGX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VOT vs. FMDGX - Dividend Comparison
VOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than FMDGX's 2.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.72% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.56% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.81% |
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | 2.05% | 1.85% | 0.47% | 0.63% | 0.81% | 6.43% | 0.36% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
VOT vs. FMDGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOT drawdown since its inception was -60.16%, which is greater than FMDGX's maximum drawdown of -38.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOT and FMDGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOT | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.16% | -38.59% | -21.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.96% | -14.75% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.19% | -38.59% | +1.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.36% | -14.75% | +1.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.01% | -11.34% | +1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.10% | 4.65% | +0.45% |
Volatility
VOT vs. FMDGX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) at 5.67%. This indicates that VOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VOT | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 5.67% | +0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.32% | 12.66% | -0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.01% | 22.94% | -1.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 22.37% | -1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 24.47% | -3.55% |